Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27158589›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage. Clinical2016

Maturation of auditory neural processes in autism spectrum disorder - A longitudinal MEG study.

Russell G Port, J Christopher Edgar, Matthew Ku, Luke Bloy, Rebecca Murray, Lisa Blaskey, Susan E Levy, Timothy P L Roberts

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Auditory processing in rodent models of autism: a systematic review.Journal of neurodevelopmental disorders · 2022
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. How auditory processing influences the autistic profile: A review.Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Rodent Models for ASD Biomarker Development.Advances in neurobiology · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Russell G PortLurie Family Foundations MEG Imaging Center, Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
J Christopher EdgarLurie Family Foundations MEG Imaging Center, Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Matthew KuLurie Family Foundations MEG Imaging Center, Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Luke BloyLurie Family Foundations MEG Imaging Center, Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Rebecca MurrayLurie Family Foundations MEG Imaging Center, Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Lisa BlaskeyLurie Family Foundations MEG Imaging Center, Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Susan E LevyDepartment of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Timothy P L RobertsLurie Family Foundations MEG Imaging Center, Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA. Electronic address: robertstim@email.chop.edu.
Imaging Center · USChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia · US

Funding

TRANSGENIC MOUSE MODELS OF MENTAL RETARDATIONP30HD026979 · NICHD · CHILDREN'S HOSP OF PHILADELPHIA · PI ROBERTS, TIMOTHY P · 1990 to 2015
$15.3M
The Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center at CHOP/PennU54HD086984 · NICHD · CHILDREN'S HOSP OF PHILADELPHIA · PI YUDKOFF, MARC · 2016 to 2020
$6.3M
Electrophysiological Signatures of Language Impairment in Autism Spectrum DisordeR01DC008871 · NIDCD · CHILDREN'S HOSP OF PHILADELPHIA · PI ROBERTS, TIMOTHY P · 2007 to 2018
$3.6M
NICHD NIH HHS P30 HD026979NICHD NIH HHS U54 HD086984NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC008871
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIndividuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) show atypical brain activity, perhaps due to delayed maturation. Previous studies examining the maturation of auditory electrophysiological activity have been limited due to their use of cross-sectional designs. The present study took a first step in examining magnetoencephalography (MEG) evidence of abnormal auditory response maturation in ASD via the use of a longitudinal design.

methodsInitially recruited for a previous study, 27 children with ASD and nine typically developing (TD) children, aged 6- to 11-years-old, were re-recruited two to five years later. At both timepoints, MEG data were obtained while participants passively listened to sinusoidal pure-tones. Bilateral primary/secondary auditory cortex time domain (100 ms evoked response latency (M100)) and spectrotemporal measures (gamma-band power and inter-trial coherence (ITC)) were examined. MEG measures were also qualitatively examined for five children who exhibited "optimal outcome", participants who were initially on spectrum, but no longer met diagnostic criteria at follow-up.

resultsM100 latencies were delayed in ASD versus TD at the initial exam (~ 19 ms) and at follow-up (~ 18 ms). At both exams, M100 latencies were associated with clinical ASD severity. In addition, gamma-band evoked power and ITC were reduced in ASD versus TD. M100 latency and gamma-band maturation rates did not differ between ASD and TD. Of note, the cohort of five children that demonstrated "optimal outcome" additionally exhibited M100 latency and gamma-band activity mean values in-between TD and ASD at both timepoints. Though justifying only qualitative interpretation, these "optimal outcome" related data are presented here to motivate future studies.

conclusionsChildren with ASD showed perturbed auditory cortex neural activity, as evidenced by M100 latency delays as well as reduced transient gamma-band activity. Despite evidence for maturation of these responses in ASD, the neural abnormalities in ASD persisted across time. Of note, data from the five children whom demonstrated "optimal outcome" qualitatively suggest that such clinical improvements may be associated with auditory brain responses intermediate between TD and ASD. These "optimal outcome" related results are not statistically significant though, likely due to the low sample size of this cohort, and to be expected as a result of the relatively low proportion of "optimal outcome" in the ASD population. Thus, further investigations with larger cohorts are needed to determine if the above auditory response phenotypes have prognostic utility, predictive of clinical outcome.

Indexed as

Brain MappingMagnetoencephalographyAcoustic StimulationAuditory CortexAuditory PathwaysAutism Spectrum DisorderChildCohort StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesEvoked Potentials, AuditoryFemaleHumansMaleNeuropsychological TestsPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesReaction TimeASDGammaM100MaturationMEG

Identifiers

PMID27158589
PMCPMC4844592
OpenAlexW2325339912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.