Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27158528›Full record

ArticleBMJ innovations2016

Open-source hardware for medical devices.

Gerrit Niezen, Parisa Eslambolchilar, Harold Thimbleby

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ innovations, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 115 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Building and Sustaining Open-Source Medical Device Projects.IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. An open-source, non-invasive, novel assembly for automated real-time monitoring of continuous bladder irrigation.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Open-Source Design Platform for AAC Research: Project Open.Assistive technology outcomes and benefits · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gerrit NiezenDepartment of Computer Science , Swansea University , Swansea , UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3787-8194
Parisa EslambolchilarDepartment of Computer Science , Swansea University , Swansea , UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4610-1643
Harold ThimblebyDepartment of Computer Science , Swansea University , Swansea , UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2222-4243
Swansea University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Open-source hardware is hardware whose design is made publicly available so anyone can study, modify, distribute, make and sell the design or the hardware based on that design. Some open-source hardware projects can potentially be used as active medical devices. The open-source approach offers a unique combination of advantages, including reducing costs and faster innovation. This article compares 10 of open-source healthcare projects in terms of how easy it is to obtain the required components and build the device.

Indexed as

AffordableGlobal HealthInventions

Identifiers

PMID27158528
PMCPMC4853539
OpenAlexW2321001332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.