Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27158518›Full record

ArticleBMJ open diabetes research & care2016

Patients' with type 2 diabetes willingness to pay for insulin therapy and clinical outcomes.

Michael D Feher, John Brazier, Nicolaas Schaper, Gabriela Vega-Hernandez, Annie Nikolajsen, Mette Bøgelund

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open diabetes research & care, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Perspectives and Preferences of People with Type 2 Diabetes for the Attributes of Weekly Insulin.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Michael D FeherBeta Cell Diabetes Centre, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, UK; Diabetes Therapies Evaluation Network, London, UK.
John BrazierSchool of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield , Sheffield , UK.
Nicolaas SchaperDepartment of Internal Medicine , CAPHRI School for Primary Care and Public Health and CARIM Institute, Maastricht University Medical Centre , Maastricht , The Netherlands.
Gabriela Vega-HernandezNovo Nordisk A/S , Soeborg , Denmark.
Annie NikolajsenNovo Nordisk A/S , Soeborg , Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-8674-6134
Mette BøgelundIncentive , Holte , Denmark.
Novo Nordisk (Denmark) · DKChelsea and Westminster Hospital · GBMaastricht University Medical Centre · NLUniversity of Sheffield · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study assessed patient preferences, using willingness to pay as a method to measure different treatment characteristics or attributes associated with injectable insulin therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND

methodsAdults with type 2 diabetes in 12 countries, diagnosed >6 months prior and receiving insulin for >3 months, were recruited through a representative online panel. Data were collected via online questionnaire and analyzed using a standard choice model for discrete choice experiment.

resultsA total of 3758 patients from North America (n=646), South America (n=1537), and Europe (n=1575) completed the study. Mean glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels in North America, South America, and Europe were 63 mmol/mol (7.9%), 75 mmol/mol (9.0%), and 64 mmol/mol (8.0%), respectively. In the three regions, monthly willingness to pay was US$116, US$74, and US$92, respectively, for a 1%-point decrease in HbA1c; US$99, US$80, and US$104 for one less major hypoglycemic event per year; and US$64, US$37 and US$60 for a 3 kg weight decrease. To avoid preinjection preparation of insulin, the respective values were US$47, US$18, and US$37, and US$25, US$25, and US$24 for one less injection per day. Among respondents on basal-only insulin who had previously tried a more intensive regimen, reasons for switching back included difficulty in handling multiple injections and risk of hypoglycemic events.

conclusionsReducing HbA1c, frequency of major hypoglycemic events and weight decrease were the highest valued outcomes in each region. The administrative burden of injections was also considered important.

Indexed as

Patient PreferencesTreatment Adherence/ComplianceTreatment With InsulinType 2 Diabetes

Identifiers

PMID27158518
PMCPMC4853803
OpenAlexW2342857651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.