ReviewF1000Research2016
Recent advances in echocardiography: strain and strain rate imaging.
Review in F1000Research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical Utility of Strain Imaging in Assessment of Myocardial Fibrosis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Biventricular Myocardial Strain Analysis in Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Using Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Tissue-Tracking Technology.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Longitudinal Speckle Tracking Strain Abnormalities in Chagas Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Fibrosis in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: role of novel echo techniques and multi-modality imaging assessment.Heart failure reviews · 2021Review
- Cardiac monitoring in HER2-positive patients on trastuzumab treatment: A review and implications for clinical practice.Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2020Review
- Reverse remodeling and arrhythmic burden reduction in a patient with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator treated with sacubitril/valsartan: Case report.Clinical case reports · 2020Article
- Circumferential strain rate to detect lipopolysaccharide-induced cardiac dysfunction: a speckle tracking echocardiography study.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2019Article
- Strain Analysis of Left Ventricular Function in the Association of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy and Systemic Arterial Hypertension.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2019Article
- Comprehensive echocardiographic assessment of biventricular function in the rabbit, animal model in cardiovascular research: feasibility and normal values.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2018Article
- Early Diagnosis of Cardiovascular Diseases in Workers: Role of Standard and Advanced Echocardiography.BioMed research international · 2018Review
- Myocardial deformation in iron overload cardiomyopathy: speckle tracking imaging in a beta-thalassemia major population.Internal and emergency medicine · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Deformation imaging by echocardiography is a well-established research tool which has been gaining interest from clinical cardiologists since the introduction of speckle tracking. Post-processing of echo images to analyze deformation has become readily available at the fingertips of the user. New parameters such as global longitudinal strain have been shown to provide added diagnostic value, and ongoing efforts of the imaging societies and industry aimed at harmonizing methods will improve the technique further. This review focuses on recent advances in the field of echocardiographic strain and strain rate imaging, and provides an overview on its current and potential future clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.