ReviewF1000Research2016
Kin and multilevel selection in social evolution: a never-ending controversy?
Review in F1000Research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multilevel selection theory informs context-dependent mycorrhizal functioning.Frontiers in microbiomes · 2025Article
- Colony level fitness analysis identifies a trade-off between population growth rate and dauer yield in Caenorhabditis elegans.BMC ecology and evolution · 2024Article
- The social formation of fitness: lifetime consequences of prenatal nutrition and postnatal care in a wild mammal population.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023Article
- The role of the ecological scaffold in the origin and maintenance of whole-group trait altruism in microbial populations.BMC ecology and evolution · 2023Article
- Toward a theory of evolution as multilevel learning.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022Article
- Social complexity as a driving force of gut microbiota exchange among conspecific hosts in non-human primates.Frontiers in integrative neuroscience · 2022Review
- Altruism and Phenoptosis as Programs Supported by Evolution.Biochemistry. Biokhimiia · 2021Article
- Evaluating kin and group selection as tools for quantitative analysis of microbial data.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2021Article
- Death happy: adaptive ageing and its evolution by kin selection in organisms with colonial ecology.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021Article
- Toward Unifying Evolutionary Ecology and Genomics to Understand Positive Plant-Plant Interactions Within Wild Species.Frontiers in plant science · 2021Review
- Inclusive groups can avoid the tragedy of the commons.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Shorter life and reduced fecundity can increase colony fitness in virtual Caenorhabditis elegans.Aging cell · 2020Article
- The Price equation and the unity of social evolution theory.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020Article
- Ageing Throughout History: The Evolution of Human Lifespan.Journal of molecular evolution · 2020Review
- Social style and resilience of macaques' networks, a theoretical investigation.Primates; journal of primatology · 2019Article
- Does senescence promote fitness in Caenorhabditis elegans by causing death?Ageing research reviews · 2019Review
- Shearing in flow environment promotes evolution of social behavior in microbial populations.eLife · 2018Article
- Mate limitation and sex ratio evolution.Royal Society open science · 2018Article
- Diversity Generator Mechanisms Are Essential Components of Biological Systems: The Two Queen Hypothesis.Frontiers in microbiology · 2018Article
- Give one species the task to come up with a theory that spans them all: what good can come out of that?Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Kin selection and multilevel selection are two major frameworks in evolutionary biology that aim at explaining the evolution of social behaviors. However, the relationship between these two theories has been plagued by controversy for almost half a century and debates about their relevance and usefulness in explaining social evolution seem to rekindle at regular intervals. Here, we first provide a concise introduction into the kin selection and multilevel selection theories and shed light onto the roots of the controversy surrounding them. We then review two major aspects of the current debate: the presumed formal equivalency of the two theories and the question whether group selection can lead to group adaptation. We conclude by arguing that the two theories can offer complementary approaches to the study of social evolution: kin selection approaches usually focus on the identification of optimal phenotypes and thus on the endresult of a selection process, whereas multilevel selection approaches focus on the ongoing selection process itself. The two theories thus provide different perspectives that might be fruitfully combined to promote our understanding of the evolution in group-structured populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.