Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27158422›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of radiology2016

Radiation sterilization of tissue allografts: A review.

Rita Singh, Durgeshwer Singh, Antaryami Singh

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of radiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 80 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
80citing papers in PubMed
8.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

80 citing papers in PubMed, 209 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Metallofullerenol ScAdvanced healthcare materials · 2026
    Article
  5. The supercritical COBone reports · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Pericardium decellularization in a one-day, two-step protocol.Molecular and cellular biochemistry · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

20 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Rita SinghRita Singh, Durgeshwer Singh, Antaryami Singh, Radiation Dosimetry and Processing Group, Defence Laboratory, Defence Research and Development Organization, Jodhpur 342011, India.
Durgeshwer SinghRita Singh, Durgeshwer Singh, Antaryami Singh, Radiation Dosimetry and Processing Group, Defence Laboratory, Defence Research and Development Organization, Jodhpur 342011, India.
Antaryami SinghRita Singh, Durgeshwer Singh, Antaryami Singh, Radiation Dosimetry and Processing Group, Defence Laboratory, Defence Research and Development Organization, Jodhpur 342011, India.
Defence Laboratory Jodhpur · INCreative Research Enterprises (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tissue substitutes are required in a number of clinical conditions for treatment of injured and diseased tissues. Tissues like bone, skin, amniotic membrane and soft tissues obtained from human donor can be used for repair or reconstruction of the injured part of the body. Allograft tissues from human donor provide an excellent alternative to autografts. However, major concern with the use of allografts is the risk of infectious disease transmission. Therefore, tissue allografts should be sterilized to make them safe for clinical use. Gamma radiation has several advantages and is the most suitable method for sterilization of biological tissues. This review summarizes the use of gamma irradiation technology as an effective method for sterilization of biological tissues and ensuring safety of tissue allografts.

Indexed as

AllograftsGamma radiationMicrobial contaminationSterilizationTissues

Identifiers

PMID27158422
PMCPMC4840193
OpenAlexW2340926226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.