Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27158357›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2016

Cytomegalovirus induces strong antileukemic effect in acute myeloid leukemia patients following sibling HSCT without ATG-containing regimen.

Xiebing Bao, Qian Zhu, Shengli Xue, Xiaohui Hu, Xiao Ma, Feng Chen, Suning Chen, Aining Sun, Depei Wu, Jianhua Yu and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of translational research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Xiebing BaoJiangsu Institute of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow UniversitySuzhou, China; Collaborative Innovation Center of Hematology, Soochow UniversitySuzhou, China; Suzhou Institute of Blood and Marrow TransplantationSuzhou, China.
Qian ZhuDepartment of Hematology, 100th Hospital of People's Liberation Army Suzhou, China.
Shengli XueJiangsu Institute of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow UniversitySuzhou, China; Collaborative Innovation Center of Hematology, Soochow UniversitySuzhou, China; Suzhou Institute of Blood and Marrow TransplantationSuzhou, China.
Xiaohui HuJiangsu Institute of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow UniversitySuzhou, China; Collaborative Innovation Center of Hematology, Soochow UniversitySuzhou, China; Suzhou Institute of Blood and Marrow TransplantationSuzhou, China.
Xiao MaJiangsu Institute of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow UniversitySuzhou, China; Collaborative Innovation Center of Hematology, Soochow UniversitySuzhou, China; Suzhou Institute of Blood and Marrow TransplantationSuzhou, China.
Feng ChenJiangsu Institute of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow UniversitySuzhou, China; Collaborative Innovation Center of Hematology, Soochow UniversitySuzhou, China; Suzhou Institute of Blood and Marrow TransplantationSuzhou, China.
Suning ChenJiangsu Institute of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow UniversitySuzhou, China; Collaborative Innovation Center of Hematology, Soochow UniversitySuzhou, China; Suzhou Institute of Blood and Marrow TransplantationSuzhou, China.
Aining SunJiangsu Institute of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow UniversitySuzhou, China; Collaborative Innovation Center of Hematology, Soochow UniversitySuzhou, China; Suzhou Institute of Blood and Marrow TransplantationSuzhou, China.
Depei WuJiangsu Institute of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow UniversitySuzhou, China; Collaborative Innovation Center of Hematology, Soochow UniversitySuzhou, China; Suzhou Institute of Blood and Marrow TransplantationSuzhou, China.
Jianhua YuDivision of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA.
Xiaojin WuJiangsu Institute of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow UniversitySuzhou, China; Collaborative Innovation Center of Hematology, Soochow UniversitySuzhou, China; Suzhou Institute of Blood and Marrow TransplantationSuzhou, China.
Huiying QiuJiangsu Institute of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow UniversitySuzhou, China; Collaborative Innovation Center of Hematology, Soochow UniversitySuzhou, China; Suzhou Institute of Blood and Marrow TransplantationSuzhou, China.
Soochow University · CN117th Hospital of People's Liberation Army · CNThe Ohio State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A considerable number of studies have demonstrated that cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (Allo-HSCT) could enforce graft-versus leukemia (GVL) effect in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients. However, the use of antithymocyte globulin (ATG) as part of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis may dampen this beneficial effect of CMV replication. In this context, we retrospectively analyzed the effect of CMV reactivation on relapse, survival and prognosis in a total of 227 AML patients who received a myeloablative (MA) conditioning regimen at a single research center between January 2010 and April 2013. Of these 227 patients, 110 cases received non-ATG-containing regimens and 117 cases received ATG-containing regimens. CMV reactivation occurred in 45 patients (41%) among non-ATG regimen group and 73 patients (62%) among ATG regimen group (P = 0.001). At a median time to follow-up of 27.5 months, a lower risk of cumulative relapse incidence associated with CMV reactivation was observed in non-ATG group in multivariate analyses (OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.10-0.79; P = 0.016). However, CMV reactivation after transplantation did not significantly decrease the cumulative incidence of relapse in our ATG group (OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.10-0.79; P = 0.016). Collectively, our results demonstrate that in AML patients following sibling HSCT, the CMV-induced beneficial effect on relapse occurs only in the MA regimens containing no ATG, although ATG promotes CMV reactivation.

Indexed as

Acute myeloid leukemiaantileukemic effectantithymocyte globulinCMV reactivationhematopoietic stem cell transplantationmyeloablative regimenrelapse

Identifiers

PMID27158357
PMCPMC4846914
OpenAlexW2406107654

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.