Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27158322›Full record

ArticleCurrent fungal infection reports2016

Evolution of Cryptococcal Antigen Testing: What is new?

Elizabeth Nalintya, Reuben Kiggundu, David Meya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current fungal infection reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. An Optimized In-House Protocol forJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Associations betweenJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Clinical Aspects of Immune Damage in Cryptococcosis.Current fungal infection reports · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Cryptococcal meningitis in a previously healthy child.Malawi medical journal : the journal of Medical Association of Malawi · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Elizabeth NalintyaInfectious Diseases Institute, Mulago Hill Road, Makerere University, Uganda.
Reuben KiggunduInfectious Diseases Institute, Mulago Hill Road, Makerere University, Uganda.
David MeyaInfectious Diseases Institute, Mulago Hill Road, Makerere University, Uganda.; Department of Medicine, Center for Infectious Diseases and Microbiology Translational Research, University of Minnesota, USA.; School of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University.
Infectious Diseases Institute · UGMakerere University · UGUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

CGH CDC HHS U01 GH000517
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the last decade, an upsurge in both the frequency and severity of fungal infections due to the HIV/AIDS epidemic and the use of immunosuppressive therapy has occurred. Even diagnostic methods like culture and microscopy, which have low sensitivity and longer turn-around-times are not widely available, leading to delays in timely antifungal therapy and detrimental patient outcomes. The evolution of cryptococcal antigen (CrAg) testing to develop inexpensive and more sensitive methods to detect cryptococcal antigen is significant. These newer tests employ immunoassays as part of point-of-care platforms, which do not require complex laboratory infrastructure and they have the potential to detect early disease and reduce time to diagnosis of cryptococcal infection. Advocacy for widely available and efficacious life-saving antifungal treatment should be the only remaining challenge.

Indexed as

antigenassaycryptococcal diseasecryptococcal meningitisCryptococcusdiagnosisFungusHIVlateral flowtestingthermal contrast

Identifiers

PMID27158322
PMCPMC4858186
OpenAlexW2338843999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.