Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27158281›Full record

ArticleTheoretical ecology2016

An updated perspective on the role of environmental autocorrelation in animal populations.

Jake M Ferguson, Felipe Carvalho, Oscar Murillo-García, Mark L Taper, José M Ponciano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Theoretical ecology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Ecological forecasts reveal limitations of common model selection methods: predicting changes in beaver colony densities.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2021
    Article
  2. Life in fluctuating environments.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Effect of extreme sea surface temperature events on the demography of an age-structured albatross population.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jake M FergusonDepartment of Biology, University of Florida, National Institute for Mathematical and Biological Synthesis, University of Tennessee troutinthemilk@gmail.com.
Felipe CarvalhoProgram of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, School of Forest Resources and Conservation, University of Florida.
Oscar Murillo-GarcíaSchool of Natural Resources and Environment & Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, University of Florida, Grupo de Investigación en Ecología Animal, Departamento de Biología, Universidad del Valle.
Mark L TaperDepartment of Ecology, Montana State University.
José M PoncianoDepartment of Biology, University of Florida.

Funding

Genetic regulationR01GM103604 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI PONCIANO, JOSE MIGUEL · 2013 to 2016
$947k
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM103604
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ecological theory predicts that the presence of temporal autocorrelation in environments can considerably affect population extinction risk. However, empirical estimates of autocorrelation values in animal populations have not decoupled intrinsic growth and density feedback processes from environmental autocorrelation. In this study we first discuss how the autocorrelation present in environmental covariates can be reduced through nonlinear interactions or by interactions with multiple limiting resources. We then estimated the degree of environmental autocorrelation present in the Global Population Dynamics Database using a robust, model-based approach. Our empirical results indicate that time series of animal populations are affected by low levels of environmental autocorrelation, a result consistent with predictions from our theoretical models. Claims supporting the importance of autocorrelated environments have been largely based on indirect empirical measures and theoretical models seldom anchored in realistic assumptions. It is likely that a more nuanced understanding of the effects of autocorrelated environments is necessary to reconcile our conclusions with previous theory. We anticipate that our findings and other recent results will lead to improvements in understanding how to incorporate fluctuating environments into population risk assessments.

Indexed as

autocorrelationenvironmental trackingEnvironmental variationextinction risktime series

Identifiers

PMID27158281
PMCPMC4856168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.