ArticleAdvances in dual diagnosis
Comparative Analysis of Treatment Conditions upon Psychiatric Severity Levels at Two Years Among Justice Involved Persons.
Article in Advances in dual diagnosis. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Health care utilization and cost after discharge from a mental health hospital; an RCT comparing community residential aftercare and treatment as usual.BMC psychiatry · 2018Trial
- Complex Contexts within Oxford Houses: Psychiatrically Comorbid Social Networks.Alcoholism treatment quarterly · 2023Article
- An Examination of Psychiatric Severity and Social Cohesion Outcomes within Oxford Houses.Community mental health journal · 2022Article
- An examination of abstinence social support among recovery home residents with psychiatric comorbidity.Drug and alcohol dependence · 2021Article
- TheJournal of groups in addiction & recovery · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe aim of this investigation was to compare the effects of two types of community-based, residential treatment programs among justice involved persons with dual diagnoses. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY: A randomized clinical trial examined treatment conditions among justice involved persons with substance use disorders who reported high baseline levels of psychiatric severity indicative of diagnosable psychiatric comorbidity. Participants (
findingsParticipants randomly assigned to residential conditions reported significant reductions in psychiatric severity whereas those assigned to the usual care condition reported significant increases. There were no significant differences in psychiatric severity levels between residential conditions. RESEARCH LIMITATIONS/IMPLICATIONS: Findings suggest that cost-effective, self-run residential settings such as Oxford Houses provide benefits comparable to professionally-run residential integrated treatments for justice involved persons who have dual diagnoses. SOCIAL IMPLICATIONS: Results support the utilization of low-cost, community-based treatments for a highly marginalized population. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: Little is known about residential treatments that reduce psychiatric severity for this population. Results extend the body of knowledge regarding the effects of community-based, residential integrated treatment and the Oxford House model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.