Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27158244›Full record

ArticleCancer cell international2016

Temozolomide promotes genomic and phenotypic changes in glioblastoma cells.

Aleksei A Stepanenko, Svitlana V Andreieva, Kateryna V Korets, Dmytro O Mykytenko, Vladimir P Baklaushev, Nataliya L Huleyuk, Oksana A Kovalova, Kateryna V Kotsarenko, Vladimir P Chekhonin, Yegor S Vassetzky and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer cell international, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Harnessing the immune system in glioblastoma.British journal of cancer · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Aleksei A StepanenkoDepartment of Biosynthesis of Nucleic Acids, Institute of Molecular Biology and Genetics, National Academy of Science of Ukraine, Zabolotnogo str. 150, Kiev, 03680 Ukraine.
Svitlana V AndreievaDepartment of Biosynthesis of Nucleic Acids, Institute of Molecular Biology and Genetics, National Academy of Science of Ukraine, Zabolotnogo str. 150, Kiev, 03680 Ukraine.
Kateryna V KoretsDepartment of Biosynthesis of Nucleic Acids, Institute of Molecular Biology and Genetics, National Academy of Science of Ukraine, Zabolotnogo str. 150, Kiev, 03680 Ukraine.
Dmytro O MykytenkoDepartment of Biosynthesis of Nucleic Acids, Institute of Molecular Biology and Genetics, National Academy of Science of Ukraine, Zabolotnogo str. 150, Kiev, 03680 Ukraine.
Vladimir P BaklaushevDepartment of Medicinal Nanobiotechnology, Pirogov Russian State Medical University, Ostrovitianov str. 1, Moscow, 117997 Russia ; Federal Research and Clinical Centre, FMBA of Russia, Orekhoviy Bulvar str. 28, Moscow, 115682 Russia.
Nataliya L HuleyukDepartment of Diagnostic of Hereditary Pathology, Institute of Hereditary Pathology, National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine, Lysenko str. 31A, Lviv, 79008 Ukraine.
Oksana A KovalovaDepartment of Experimental Cell System, R.E.Kavetsky Institute of Experimental Pathology, Oncology and Radiobiology, National Academy of Science of Ukraine, Vasylkivska str. 45, Kiev, 03022 Ukraine.
Kateryna V KotsarenkoDepartment of Human Genetics, Institute of Molecular Biology and Genetics, National Academy of Science of Ukraine, Zabolotnogo str. 150, Kiev, 03680 Ukraine.
Vladimir P ChekhoninDepartment of Medicinal Nanobiotechnology, Pirogov Russian State Medical University, Ostrovitianov str. 1, Moscow, 117997 Russia.
Yegor S VassetzkyCNRS UMR8126, Institut de Cancérologie Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Sud 11, Camille-Desmoulins str. 39, Villejuif, 94805 France.
Stanislav S AvdieievDepartment of Biosynthesis of Nucleic Acids, Institute of Molecular Biology and Genetics, National Academy of Science of Ukraine, Zabolotnogo str. 150, Kiev, 03680 Ukraine.
Vladimir V DmitrenkoDepartment of Biosynthesis of Nucleic Acids, Institute of Molecular Biology and Genetics, National Academy of Science of Ukraine, Zabolotnogo str. 150, Kiev, 03680 Ukraine.
Institute of Molecular Biology and Genetics · UAPirogov Russian National Research Medical University · RUCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRNational Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine · UAR.E. Kavetsky Institute of Experimental Pathology, Oncology and Radiobiology · UA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTemozolomide (TMZ) is a first-line drug for the treatment of glioblastoma. Long-term TMZ-treated tumour cells acquire TMZ resistance by profound reprogramming of the transcriptome, proteome, kinome, metabolism, and demonstrate versatile and opposite changes in proliferation, invasion, in vivo growth, and drug cross-resistance. We hypothesized that chromosomal instability (CIN) may be implicated in the generation of TMZ-driven molecular and phenotype diversity. CIN refers to the rate (cell-to-cell variability) with which whole chromosomes or portions of chromosomes are gained or lost.

methodsThe long-term TMZ-treated cell lines were established in vitro (U251TMZ1, U251TMZ2, T98GTMZ and C6TMZ) and in vivo (C6R2TMZ). A glioma model was achieved by the intracerebral stereotactic implantation of C6 cells into the striatum region of rats. Genomic and phenotypic changes were analyzed by conventional cytogenetics, array CGH, trypan blue exclusion assay, soft agar colony formation assay, scratch wound healing assay, transwell invasion assay, quantitative polymerase chain reaction, and Western blotting.

resultsLong-term TMZ treatment increased CIN-mediated genomic diversity in U251TMZ1, U251TMZ2 and T98GTMZ cells but reduced it in C6TMZ and C6R2TMZ cells. U251TMZ1 and U251TMZ2 cell lines, established in parallel with a similar treatment procedure with the only difference in the duration of treatment, underwent individual phenotypic changes. U251TMZ1 had a reduced proliferation and invasion but increased migration, whereas U251TMZ2 had an enhanced proliferation and invasion but no changes in migration. U251TMZ1 and U251TMZ2 cells demonstrated individual patterns in expression/activation of signal transduction proteins (e.g., MDM2, p53, ERK, AKT, and ASK). C6TMZ and C6R2TMZ cells had lower proliferation, colony formation efficiency and migration, whereas T98GTMZ cells had increased colony formation efficiency without any changes in proliferation, migration, and invasion. TMZ-treated lines demonstrated a differential response to a reduction in glucose concentration and an increased resistance to TMZ re-challenge but not temsirolimus (mTOR inhibitor) or U0126 (MEK1/2 inhibitor) treatment.

conclusionLong-term TMZ treatment selected resistant genotype-phenotype variants or generated novel versatile phenotypes by increasing CIN. An increase of resistance to TMZ re-challenge seems to be the only predictable trait intrinsic to all long-term TMZ-treated tumour cells. Changes in genomic diversity may be responsible for heterogeneous phenotypes of TMZ-treated cell lines.

Indexed as

AneuploidyChromosome instabilityDrug resistanceGliomaHeterogeneityKaryotype

Identifiers

PMID27158244
PMCPMC4858898
OpenAlexW2346180375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.