Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27156092›Full record

Observational studyWorld journal of urology2017

Five-year experience with the adjustable transobturator male system for the treatment of male stress urinary incontinence: a single-center evaluation.

Sandra Mühlstädt, Alexander Friedl, Nasreldin Mohammed, André Schumann, Karl Weigand, Felix Kawan, Christian Göllert, Christin Kahlert, Gerit Theil, Kersten Fischer and 1 more

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in World journal of urology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sandra MühlstädtDepartment of Urology and Kidney Transplantation, Martin Luther University, Halle (Saale), Ernst-Grube-Straße 40, 06120, Halle (Saale), Germany. sandra.muehlstaedt@uk-halle.de.
Alexander FriedlDepartment of Urology, Hospital Göttlicher Heiland, Vienna, Austria.
Nasreldin MohammedDepartment of Urology and Kidney Transplantation, Martin Luther University, Halle (Saale), Ernst-Grube-Straße 40, 06120, Halle (Saale), Germany.
André SchumannDepartment of Urology and Kidney Transplantation, Martin Luther University, Halle (Saale), Ernst-Grube-Straße 40, 06120, Halle (Saale), Germany.
Karl WeigandDepartment of Urology and Kidney Transplantation, Martin Luther University, Halle (Saale), Ernst-Grube-Straße 40, 06120, Halle (Saale), Germany.
Felix KawanDepartment of Urology and Kidney Transplantation, Martin Luther University, Halle (Saale), Ernst-Grube-Straße 40, 06120, Halle (Saale), Germany.
Christian GöllertDepartment of Urology and Kidney Transplantation, Martin Luther University, Halle (Saale), Ernst-Grube-Straße 40, 06120, Halle (Saale), Germany.
Christin KahlertDepartment of Urology and Kidney Transplantation, Martin Luther University, Halle (Saale), Ernst-Grube-Straße 40, 06120, Halle (Saale), Germany.
Gerit TheilDepartment of Urology and Kidney Transplantation, Martin Luther University, Halle (Saale), Ernst-Grube-Straße 40, 06120, Halle (Saale), Germany.
Kersten FischerDepartment of Urology and Kidney Transplantation, Martin Luther University, Halle (Saale), Ernst-Grube-Straße 40, 06120, Halle (Saale), Germany.
Paolo FornaraDepartment of Urology and Kidney Transplantation, Martin Luther University, Halle (Saale), Ernst-Grube-Straße 40, 06120, Halle (Saale), Germany.
Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe report on our 5-year experience with the adjustable transobturator male system (ATOMS

methodsBetween 10-2009 and 10-2014, 54 patients received an ATOMS. The mean follow-up of this retrospective observational trial was 27.5 ± 18.4 (2.3-59) months. Within each follow-up, the following were evaluated: micturition protocol, 24-h pad count, uroflowmetry and residual volume. Statistical analysis was performed with SigmaPlot

resultsStress urinary incontinence (SUI) I°, II° and III° was seen in 1 (1.9 %), 16 (29.6 %) and 37 patients (68.5 %), respectively. In summary, 48.1 % of the patients became "dry" (0-"safty pad"/day), while 29.6 % achieved at least an "improvement" of about more than 50 % (1-2 pads/day), which corresponds to an overall success rate of 77.7 %. The mean number of pads/day decreased from 7.7 to 1.6. Regarding the initial degree of SUI, patients with mild or moderate incontinence had a significantly better outcome (p = 0.002, 95 % CI 0.9066 to 2.760). Postoperative complications were scaled according to the Clavien classification, in which we have seen 4 grade I-, 1 grade IIIa- and 9 grade IIIb-complications (overall 25.9 %). The evaluation of quality of life by ICIQ-SF showed a significant improvement (p = 0.0001, 95 % CI -14.56 to -11.75).

conclusionThe treatment of male SUI using the ATOMS incontinence system achieved the best results in patients with mild and moderate incontinence. For severe incontinent patients, the system represents an efficient alternative.

Indexed as

Prostheses and ImplantsUrologic Surgical Procedures, MaleAgedAged, 80 and overFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesSuburethral SlingsTreatment OutcomeUrinary Incontinence, StressAdjustabilityArtificial implantsATOMSMale stress urinary incontinenceSphincter cushions

Identifiers

PMID27156092
OpenAlexW2347074236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.