ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology2016
Preclinical studies of VS-505: a non-absorbable highly effective phosphate binder.
Article in British journal of pharmacology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dietary magnesium supplementation inhibits abdominal vascular calcification in an experimental animal model of chronic kidney disease.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2022Article
- Effects of pharmacological inhibition of the sodium-dependent phosphate cotransporter 2b (NPT2b) on intestinal phosphate absorption in mouse and rat models.Pharmacology research & perspectives · 2022Article
- Fibroblast Growth Factor-23-Klotho Axis in Cardiorenal Syndrome: Mediators and Potential Therapeutic Targets.Frontiers in physiology · 2021Review
- Phosphate binders in chronic kidney disease: an updated narrative review of recent data.Journal of nephrology · 2020Review
- Preclinical studies of VS-505: a non-absorbable highly effective phosphate binder.British journal of pharmacology · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
background and purposePhosphate imbalance is often present in chronic kidney disease (CKD), and it contributes to a higher cardiovascular mortality rate. A phosphate binder is typically part of a treatment strategy for controlling phosphate imbalance. However, safety concerns and low compliance are two well-recognized disadvantages of on-market phosphate binders. This report describes the preclinical studies of VS-505, a non-absorbable, calcium- and aluminum-free, plant-derived polymer currently being evaluated in haemodialysis patients in Australia. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Normal Sprague Dawley (SD) rats or uraemic SD rats induced by 5/6 nephrectomy fed a high-phosphate diet were treated with VS-505 or sevelamer (0.05-10% in food) for 5 and 28 days respectively. KEY
resultsUrinary and serum phosphate levels were significantly elevated in untreated rats, and were decreased by VS-505 and sevelamer. VS-505 increased faecal phosphate levels in a dose-dependent manner. High-phosphate diet also caused an increase in serum FGF-23 and parathyroid hormone in nephrectomized (NX) rats, effects prevented by VS-505 or sevelamer. Significant aortic calcification was observed in NX rats treated with 5% sevelamer, whereas VS-505 at all doses tested did not show effects. VS-505 had no effects on small intestine histomorphology and intestinal sodium-dependent phosphate cotransporter gene expression. In vitro characterizations showed that VS-505 has a relatively high density and low expansion volume when exposed to simulated gastric fluid. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: VS-505 is a safe and effective phosphate binder and may offer the advantage of having a reduced pill burden and minimal GI side effects for CKD patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.