Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27155883›Full record

ArticleOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2016

In vivo assessment of bone structure and estimated bone strength by first- and second-generation HR-pQCT.

S Agarwal, F Rosete, C Zhang, D J McMahon, X E Guo, E Shane, K K Nishiyama

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Calcitriol supplementation after kidney transplantation: results of a double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2025
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Skeletal risk factors for postoperative complications in older men undergoing spinal fusion surgery.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. HR-pQCT reveals marked trabecular and cortical structural deficits in women with pregnancy and lactation-associated osteoporosis (PLO).Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Fractures in women with type 2 diabetes are associated with marked deficits in cortical parameters and trabecular plates.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Bone mineral density, turnover, and microarchitecture assessed by second-generation high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography in patients with Sheehan's syndrome.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Pre-operative bone quality deficits and risk of complications following spine fusion surgery among postmenopausal women.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

S AgarwalDivision of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
F RoseteDivision of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
C ZhangDivision of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
D J McMahonDivision of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
X E GuoDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
E ShaneDivision of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
K K NishiyamaDivision of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA. kn2205@columbia.edu.
Columbia University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledBone strength is dependent on bone density and microstructure. High-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) can measure microstructure but is somewhat limited due to its resolution. We compared a new HR-pQCT scanner to existing technology and found very good agreement for most parameters. This study will be important when interpreting results from different devices.

introductionRecently, a second-generation HR-pQCT scanner (XCT2) has been developed with a higher nominal isotropic resolution (61 μm) compared to the first-generation device (XCT1, 82 μm). It is unclear how in vivo measurements from these two devices compare. In this study, we obtained and analyzed in vivo XCT1 and XCT2 measurements of bone microarchitecture and estimated strength.

methodsWe scanned 51 adults (16 men and 35 women, age 44.8 ± 16.0) on both XCT2 and XCT1 on the same day. We first compared XCT1 and XCT2 measurements obtained using their respective standard patient protocols. In XCT1, microarchitecture parameters were derived, while XCT2 measurements were directly measured. We also compared XCT2-D with XCT1 by finding the overlapping regions of interest and using the standard patient protocol for XCT1.

resultsWe obtained excellent agreement between XCT1 and XCT2 for most of the volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD), trabecular and cortical measurements (All R (2) > 0.820) except for cortical porosity at the radius (R (2) = 0.638), trabecular number (R (2) = 0.694, 0.787) and trabecular thickness (R (2) = 0.569, 0.527) at both radius and tibia, respectively. XCT1 and XCT2-D measurements also had excellent agreement for most of the measurements (all R (2) > 0.870) except trabecular number (R (2) = 0.524, 0.706), trabecular thickness (R (2) = 0.758, 0.734) at both radius and tibia, respectively, and trabecular separation (R (2) = 0.656) at the radius.

conclusionWhile some caution should be exercised for parameters that are more dependent on image resolution, results from our study indicate that second-generation scans can be compared to more widely available first-generation data and may be beneficial for multicenter and longitudinal studies using both scanner generations.

Indexed as

Bone DensityTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdultBone and BonesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRadiusTibiaBone microarchitectureBone strengthHigh-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomographyHR-pQCT

Identifiers

PMID27155883
OpenAlexW2347192667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.