Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27155741›Full record

Trial reportThe Lancet. Oncology2016

Pictilisib for oestrogen receptor-positive, aromatase inhibitor-resistant, advanced or metastatic breast cancer (FERGI): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial.

Ian E Krop, Ingrid A Mayer, Vinod Ganju, Maura Dickler, Stephen Johnston, Serafin Morales, Denise A Yardley, Bohuslav Melichar, Andres Forero-Torres, Soo Chin Lee and 14 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Lancet. Oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01437566 (A Phase II, Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled, Randomized Study of GDC-0941 or GDC-0980 With Fulvestrant Versus Fulvestrant in Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer in Patients Resistant to Aromatase Inhibitor Therapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 160 papers, 12 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
160citing papers in PubMed, 12 pooled it
30.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01437566 phase2completednot on this map

A Phase II, Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled, Randomized Study of GDC-0941 or GDC-0980 With Fulvestrant Versus Fulvestrant in Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer in Patients Resistant to Aromatase Inhibitor Therapy

TypeinterventionalSponsorGenentech, Inc.Ran2011 to 2016Enrolled318ConditionsBreast CancerArmsFulvestrant, GDC-0941, GDC-0941 Matching Placebo, GDC-0980, GDC-0980 Matching Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

160 citing papers in PubMed, 12 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 289 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Significance of phosphoinositide 3-kinase inhibitors in advanced breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. The Predictive Role ofBioMed research international · 2020
    Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Pre-surgical trial of the AKT inhibitor MK-2206 in patients with operable invasive breast cancer: a New York Cancer Consortium trial.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2018
    Trial
  17. Phase II Study of Taselisib (GDC-0032) in Combination with Fulvestrant in Patients with HER2-Negative, Hormone Receptor-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2018
    Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Review

100 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 16 institutions in 8 countries.

Ian E KropDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address: ian_krop@dfci.harvard.edu.
Ingrid A MayerVanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Vinod GanjuPeninsula Oncology Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Maura DicklerMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Stephen JohnstonThe Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK.
Serafin MoralesHospital Arnau de Vilanova, Lleida, Spain.
Denise A YardleySarah Cannon Research Institute, and Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN, USA.
Bohuslav MelicharPalacky University Medical School and Teaching Hospital, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Andres Forero-TorresUniversity of Alabama, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Soo Chin LeeNational University Hospital, Singapore.
Richard de BoerRoyal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Katarina PetrakovaMasaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic.
Susanne VallentinHerlev University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Edith A PerezMayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Martine PiccartInstitut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Matthew EllisWashington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA.
Eric WinerDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Steven GendreauGenentech, South San Francisco, CA, USA.
Mika DerynckGenentech, South San Francisco, CA, USA.
Mark LacknerGenentech, South San Francisco, CA, USA.
Gallia LevyGenentech, South San Francisco, CA, USA.
Jiaheng QiuGenentech, South San Francisco, CA, USA.
Jing HeGenentech, South San Francisco, CA, USA.
Peter SchmidBarts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute · USHerlev Hospital · DKHospital Arnau de Vilanova · ESMasaryk Memorial Cancer Institute · CZMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USNational University Hospital · SGPalacký University Olomouc · CZQueen Mary University of London · GBRoyal Marsden Hospital · GBTennessee Oncology · USThe Royal Melbourne Hospital · AUUniversité Libre de Bruxelles · BEUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USVanderbilt University · USWashington University in St. Louis · USWinnMed · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInhibition of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) is a promising approach to overcome resistance to endocrine therapy in breast cancer. Pictilisib is an oral inhibitor of multiple PI3K isoforms. The aim of this study is to establish if addition of pictilisib to fulvestrant can improve progression-free survival in oestrogen receptor-positive, endocrine-resistant breast cancer.

methodsIn this two-part, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 study, we recruited postmenopausal women aged 18 years or older with oestrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer resistant to treatment with an aromatase inhibitor in the adjuvant or metastatic setting, from 123 medical centres across 21 countries. Part 1 included patients with or without PIK3CA mutations, whereas part 2 included only patients with PIK3CA mutations. Patients were randomly allocated (1:1 in part 1 and 2:1 in part 2) via a computer-generated hierarchical randomisation algorithm to daily oral pictilisib (340 mg in part 1 and 260 mg in part 2) or placebo starting on day 15 of cycle 1, plus intramuscular fulvestrant 500 mg on day 1 and day 15 of cycle 1 and day 1 of subsequent cycles in both groups. In part 1, we stratified patients by presence or absence of PIK3CA mutation, primary or secondary aromatase inhibitor resistance, and measurable or non-measurable disease. In part 2, we stratified patients by previous aromatase inhibitor treatment for advanced or metastatic disease or relapse during or within 6 months of an aromatase inhibitor treatment in the adjuvant setting and measurable or non-measurable disease. All patients and those administering treatment and assessing outcomes were masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival in the intention-to-treat population for both parts 1 and 2 and also separately in patients with PIK3CA-mutated tumours in part 1. Tumour assessment (physical examination and imaging scans) was investigator-assessed and done at screening and after 8 weeks, 16 weeks, 24 weeks, and 32 weeks of treatment from day 1 of cycle 1 and every 12 weeks thereafter. We assessed safety in as-treated patients who received at least one dose of study medication. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01437566.

findingsIn part 1, between Sept 27, 2011, and Jan 11, 2013, we randomly allocated 168 patients to the pictilisib (89 [53%]) or placebo (79 [47%]) group. In part 2, between March 18, 2013, and Jan 2, 2014, we randomly allocated 61 patients to the pictilisib (41 [67%]) or placebo (20 [33%]) group. In part 1, we found no difference in median progression-free survival between the pictilisib (6·6 months [95% CI 3·9-9·8]) and placebo (5·1 months [3·6-7·3]) group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·74 [95% CI 0·52-1·06]; p=0·096). We also found no difference when patients were analysed according to presence (pictilisib 6·5 months [95% CI 3·7-9·8] vs placebo 5·1 months [2·6-10·4]; HR 0·73 [95% CI 0·42-1·28]; p=0·268) or absence (5·8 months [3·6-11·1] vs 3·6 months [2·8-7·3]; HR 0·72 [0·42-1·23]; p=0·23) of PIK3CA mutation. In part 2, we also found no difference in progression-free survival between groups (5·4 months [95% CI 3·8-8·3] vs 10·0 months [3·6-13·0]; HR 1·07 [95% CI 0·53-2·18]; p=0·84). In part 1, grade 3 or worse adverse events occurred in 54 (61%) of 89 patients in the pictilisib group and 22 (28%) of 79 in the placebo group. 19 serious adverse events related to pictilisib treatment were reported in 14 (16%) of 89 patients. Only one (1%) of 79 patients reported treatment-related serious adverse events in the placebo group. In part 2, grade 3 or worse adverse events occurred in 15 (36%) of 42 patients in the pictilisib group and seven (37%) of 19 patients in the placebo group. Four serious adverse events related to pictilisib treatment were reported in two (5%) of 42 patients. One treatment-related serious adverse event occurred in one (5%) of 19 patients in the placebo group.

interpretationAlthough addition of pictilisib to fulvestrant did not significantly improve progression-free survival, dosing of pictilisib was limited by toxicity, potentially limiting its efficacy. For future assessment of PI3K inhibition as an approach to overcome resistance to hormonal therapy, inhibitors with greater selectivity than that of pictilisib might be needed to improve tolerability and potentially increase efficacy. No further investigation of pictilisib in this setting is ongoing.

fundingF Hoffmann-La Roche.

Indexed as

Salvage TherapyAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsDouble-Blind MethodDrug Resistance, NeoplasmErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesEstradiolEstrogen Receptor AntagonistsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesFulvestrantHumansMiddle AgedBiomarkers, TumorErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesEstradiolEstrogen Receptor AntagonistsFulvestrantReceptors, Estrogen

Identifiers

PMID27155741
PMCPMC5524539
OpenAlexW2346465624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.