Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27155452›Full record

ArticleResearch in microbiology2016

Electricity generation from an inorganic sulfur compound containing mining wastewater by acidophilic microorganisms.

Gaofeng Ni, Stephan Christel, Pawel Roman, Zhen Lim Wong, Martijn F M Bijmans, Mark Dopson

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research in microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. A Novel Inorganic Sulfur Compound MetabolizingFrontiers in microbiology · 2018
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Gaofeng NiCenter for Ecology and Evolution in Microbial model Systems (EEMiS), Linnaeus University, Kalmar, Sweden. Electronic address: gaofeng.ni@lnu.se.
Stephan ChristelCenter for Ecology and Evolution in Microbial model Systems (EEMiS), Linnaeus University, Kalmar, Sweden. Electronic address: stephan.christel@lnu.se.
Pawel RomanSub-Department of Environmental Technology, Wageningen University, PO Box 17, 6700 AA, Wageningen, The Netherlands; Wetsus, European Center of Excellence for Sustainable Water Technology, Oostergoweg 9, 8911 MA, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands. Electronic address: Pawel.Roman@wetsus.nl.
Zhen Lim WongCenter for Ecology and Evolution in Microbial model Systems (EEMiS), Linnaeus University, Kalmar, Sweden. Electronic address: zhen.wong07@yahoo.co.uk.
Martijn F M BijmansWetsus, European Center of Excellence for Sustainable Water Technology, Oostergoweg 9, 8911 MA, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands. Electronic address: Martijn.Bijmans@wetsus.nl.
Mark DopsonCenter for Ecology and Evolution in Microbial model Systems (EEMiS), Linnaeus University, Kalmar, Sweden. Electronic address: mark.dopson@lnu.se.
Linnaeus University · SEWater Technology (Australia) · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sulfide mineral processing often produces large quantities of wastewaters containing acid-generating inorganic sulfur compounds. If released untreated, these wastewaters can cause catastrophic environmental damage. In this study, microbial fuel cells were inoculated with acidophilic microorganisms to investigate whether inorganic sulfur compound oxidation can generate an electrical current. Cyclic voltammetry suggested that acidophilic microorganisms mediated electron transfer to the anode, and that electricity generation was catalyzed by microorganisms. A cation exchange membrane microbial fuel cell, fed with artificial wastewater containing tetrathionate as electron donor, reached a maximum whole cell voltage of 72 ± 9 mV. Stepwise replacement of the artificial anolyte with real mining process wastewater had no adverse effect on bioelectrochemical performance and generated a maximum voltage of 105 ± 42 mV. 16S rRNA gene sequencing of the microbial consortia resulted in sequences that aligned within the genera Thermoplasma, Ferroplasma, Leptospirillum, Sulfobacillus and Acidithiobacillus. This study opens up possibilities to bioremediate mining wastewater using microbial fuel cell technology.

Indexed as

Bioelectric Energy SourcesBiotaElectricityCluster AnalysisDNA, ArchaealDNA, BacterialDNA, RibosomalMiningOxidation-ReductionPhylogenyRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSequence Analysis, DNASulfur CompoundsWastewaterWater Pollutants, ChemicalDNA, ArchaealDNA, BacterialDNA, RibosomalRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSulfur CompoundsWastewaterWater Pollutants, ChemicalAcidophileElectricity generationMicrobial fuel cellMiningWastewater

Identifiers

PMID27155452
PMCPMC5015573
OpenAlexW2345319567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.