Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27154918›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of ophthalmology2017

Age-related macular degeneration in patients with uveitis.

Austin R Fox, Emily Y Chew, Catherine Meyerle, Susan Vitale, Frederick L Ferris, Robert B Nussenblatt, H Nida Sen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of ophthalmology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease in pediatric, adult and elderly: clinical characteristics and visual outcomes.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Austin R FoxNational Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Emily Y ChewNational Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Catherine MeyerleWilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Susan VitaleNational Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Frederick L FerrisNational Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Robert B NussenblattNational Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
H Nida SenNational Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
National Eye Institute · USNational Institutes of Health · USJohns Hopkins Medicine · US

Funding

Uveitis and Ocular Immunology FellowshipZIEEY000482 · NEI · NATIONAL EYE INSTITUTE · PI KODATI, SHILPA · 2009 to 2022
$4.6M
Studies of Ocular inflammation: Clinical researchZIAEY000557 · NEI · NATIONAL EYE INSTITUTE · PI SEN, HATICE · 2017 to 2018
$2.0M
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 EY999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the prevalence of large drusen in a uveitis clinic population.

designRetrospective, cohort study.

methodsPatients with primary, non-infectious uveitis 55 years or older who were seen at the National Eye Institute of the National Institutes of Health from 2004 through August 2013 were reviewed using electronic medical records and photographic databases. Patients were classified as having age-related macular degeneration (AMD) if either eye had large drusen, geographic atrophy or neovascular AMD according to definitions used by the Eye Diseases Prevalence Research Group (EDPRG). The expected number of cases and standardised mortality ratio (SMR) for large drusen were estimated based on EDPRG estimates.

resultsWe identified 177 patients aged ≥55 years as having primary non-infectious uveitis; 170 (96.0%) had gradable fundus photos. Average age was 65.0±7.5 years (range 55-87), and 87 were non-Hispanic white, 66 non-Hispanic black, 6 Hispanic white and 11 of other race/ethnicity. Large drusen were identified in four patients (2.4%; 95% CI 0.6 to 6.0). No patients were identified to have late AMD. In the uveitis cohort, the SMR for cases of large drusen, which was adjusted for age, was calculated to be 0.32 (95% CI 0.12 to 0.70) for the whole cohort, 0.28 (95% CI 0.09 to 0.79) for non-Hispanic whites and 0.46 (95% CI 0.14 to 1.29) for non-Hispanic blacks.

conclusionsLarge drusen prevalence among patients with uveitis ≥55 years of age appears less than the prevalence in the general US population after accounting for differences in age distribution, especially for non-Hispanic whites. Although the racial and gender distribution in this study population is not directly representative of the general US population, results of this study suggest possible sparing of patients with uveitis from AMD. A larger systematic study with greater power would be needed to confirm these findings.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAge DistributionEthnicityFemaleHumansMacular DegenerationMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceRetinal DrusenRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsSex DistributionUnited StatesUveitisDegenerationImmunologyInflammationMacula

Identifiers

PMID27154918
PMCPMC5589515
OpenAlexW2345744149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.