Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27154913›Full record

ReviewClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2016

Improving the Predictive Value of Preclinical Studies in Support of Radiotherapy Clinical Trials.

C Norman Coleman, Geoff S Higgins, J Martin Brown, Michael Baumann, David G Kirsch, Henning Willers, Pataje G S Prasanna, Mark W Dewhirst, Eric J Bernhard, Mansoor M Ahmed

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
15.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Radiation Oncology-Biology Integration Network: Bridging the Gap between Biological Research and Clinical Practice.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Screening and Validation of Molecular Targeted Radiosensitizers.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2021
    Article
  16. Moving Beyond the Standard of Care: Accelerate Testing of Radiation-Drug Combinations.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2021
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Therapy-Induced Senescence: Opportunities to Improve Anticancer Therapy.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

C Norman ColemanRadiation Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute (NCI), NIH, Bethesda, Maryland. ccoleman@mail.nih.gov.
Geoff S HigginsCancer Research UK/Medical Research Council, Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, United Kingdom.
J Martin BrownDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Michael BaumannOncoRay National Center for Radiation Research, Technische Universität Dresden/Helmholtz-Zenrtum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany and German Cancer Consortium, Dresden/German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ).
David G KirschDepartments of Radiation Oncology and Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Henning WillersDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Pataje G S PrasannaRadiation Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute (NCI), NIH, Bethesda, Maryland.
Mark W DewhirstDepartments of Radiation Oncology, Pathology and Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Eric J BernhardRadiation Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute (NCI), NIH, Bethesda, Maryland.
Mansoor M AhmedRadiation Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute (NCI), NIH, Bethesda, Maryland.
Stanford University · US

Funding

Radiation-induced molecular targetsZIABC010670 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI COLEMAN, NORMAN · 2009 to 2024
$17.3M
Cancer Research UK 19590Intramural NIH HHS Z99 CA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is an urgent need to improve reproducibility and translatability of preclinical data to fully exploit opportunities for molecular therapeutics involving radiation and radiochemotherapy. For in vitro research, the clonogenic assay remains the current state-of-the-art of preclinical assays, whereas newer moderate and high-throughput assays offer the potential for rapid initial screening. Studies of radiation response modification by molecularly targeted agents can be improved using more physiologic 3D culture models. Elucidating effects on the cancer stem cells (CSC, and CSC-like) and developing biomarkers for defining targets and measuring responses are also important. In vivo studies are necessary to confirm in vitro findings, further define mechanism of action, and address immunomodulation and treatment-induced modification of the microenvironment. Newer in vivo models include genetically engineered and patient-derived xenograft mouse models and spontaneously occurring cancers in domesticated animals. Selection of appropriate endpoints is important for in vivo studies; for example, regrowth delay measures bulk tumor killing, whereas local tumor control assesses effects on CSCs. The reliability of individual assays requires standardization of procedures and cross-laboratory validation. Radiation modifiers must be tested as part of clinical standard of care, which includes radiochemotherapy for most tumors. Radiation models are compatible with but also differ from those used for drug screening. Furthermore, the mechanism of a drug as a chemotherapeutic agent may be different from its interaction with radiation and/or radiochemotherapy. This provides an opportunity to expand the use of molecular-targeted agents. Clin Cancer Res; 22(13); 3138-47. ©2016 AACR.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsCell Line, TumorDisease Models, AnimalDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalHeLa CellsHumansMiceMolecular Targeted TherapyNeoplasmsNeoplastic Stem CellsRadiation-Sensitizing AgentsRadiation ToleranceReproducibility of ResultsXenograft Model Antitumor AssaysAntineoplastic AgentsRadiation-Sensitizing Agents

Identifiers

PMID27154913
PMCPMC4930691
OpenAlexW2347020928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.