Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27154905›Full record

ArticleThe journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences2016

Aging, the Central Nervous System, and Mobility in Older Adults: Interventions.

Vijay R Varma, Jeffrey M Hausdorff, Stephanie A Studenski, Caterina Rosano, Richard Camicioli, Neil B Alexander, Wen G Chen, Lewis A Lipsitz, Michelle C Carlson

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Vijay R VarmaDepartment of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland. mcarlso2@jhu.edu.
Jeffrey M HausdorffCenter for the Study of Movement, Cognition and Mobility, Neurological Institute, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, and Department of Physical Therapy, Sackler Faculty of Medicine and Sagol School of Neuroscience, Tel Aviv University, Israel.
Stephanie A StudenskiLongitudinal Studies Section, National Institute on Aging, Bethesda, Maryland.
Caterina RosanoDepartment of Epidemiology, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Richard CamicioliDepartment of Medicine, Division of Neurology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Neil B AlexanderDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Wen G ChenDivision of Neuroscience, National Institute on Aging, Bethesda, Maryland.
Lewis A LipsitzInstitute for Aging Research, Research, Hebrew Senior Life, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Michelle C CarlsonDepartment of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
Johns Hopkins University · USNational Institute on Aging · USUniversity of Alberta · CAUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

'T V ASSESSMENT - MEMORY DISORDERED PATIENTS'P50AG005146 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI ALBERT, MARILYN S. · 1985 to 2019
$37.6M
Research Education CoreP30AG024824 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Neil Alexander · 2004 to 2026
$29.2M
VARIABILITY, STABILITY & SMOOTHNESS OF WALKINGP30AG024827 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Caterina Rosano · 2004 to 2026
$28.6M
EPIDEMIOLOGY AND BIOSTATISTICS OF AGINGT32AG000247 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Karen J. Bandeen-Roche · 1996 to 2026
$13.2M
Translational Researchin Aging Trainnig ProgramT32AG023480 · NIA · HEBREW REHABILITATION CENTER FOR AGED · PI LIPSITZ, LEWIS · 2004 to 2024
$7.6M
Research Training in Age-Related Cognitive DisordersT32AG027668 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI MARILYN S. ALBERT · 2007 to 2026
$6.3M
Cerebrovascular Mechanisms of Slow Gait and FallsR01AG041785 · NIA · HEBREW REHABILITATION CENTER FOR AGED · PI LIPSITZ, LEWIS · 2013 to 2017
$2.4M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG024824NIA NIH HHS P30 AG024827NIA NIH HHS P50 AG005146NIA NIH HHS R01 AG041785NIA NIH HHS T32 AG000247NIA NIH HHS T32 AG023480NIA NIH HHS T32 AG027668
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResearch suggests that the central nervous system (CNS) and mobility are closely linked. CNS-mediated mobility impairment may represent a potentially new and prevalent syndrome within the older adult populations. Interventions targeting this group may have the potential to improve mobility and cognition and prevent disability.

methodsIn 2012, the Gerontological Society of America (GSA) and the National Institute on Aging (NIA) sponsored a 3-year conference workshop series, "Aging, the CNS, and Mobility." The goal of this third and final conference was to (i) report on the state of the science of interventions targeting CNS-mediated mobility impairment among community-dwelling older adults and (ii) partnering with the NIA, explore the future of research and intervention design focused on a potentially novel aging syndrome.

resultsEvidence was presented in five main intervention areas: (i) pharmacology and diet; (ii) exercise; (iii) electrical stimulation; (iv) sensory stimulation/deprivation; and (v) a combined category of multimodal interventions. Workshop participants identified important gaps in knowledge and key recommendations for future interventions related to recruitment and sample selection, intervention design, and methods to measure effectiveness.

conclusionsIn order to develop effective preventive interventions for this prevalent syndrome, multidisciplinary teams are essential particularly because of the complex nature of the syndrome. Additionally, integrating innovative methods into the design of interventions may help researchers better measure complex mechanisms, and finally, the value of understanding the link between the CNS and mobility should be conveyed to researchers across disciplines in order to incorporate cognitive and mobility measurements into study protocols.

Indexed as

Mobility LimitationAgedAgingCentral Nervous SystemCongresses as TopicDisability EvaluationGeriatric AssessmentHumansRisk FactorsSocieties, MedicalUnited StatesCNSCognitionDisability

Identifiers

PMID27154905
PMCPMC5055648
OpenAlexW2346038016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.