ArticleJMIR medical informatics2016
Electronic Health Record-Related Safety Concerns: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Electronic Health Record Users.
Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Longitudinal Graduate Medical Education Curriculum in Clinical Informatics: Function, Structure, and Evaluation.Applied clinical informatics · 2025Article
- The perception of facilitators and barriers to the use of e-health solutions in Poland: a qualitative study.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2024Article
- Impact of response bias in three surveys on primary care providers' experiences with electronic health records.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024Article
- Safety and Precision AI for a Modern Digital Health System.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2024Review
- Unveiling medication errors in liver transplant patients towards enhancing the imperative patient safety.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2023Article
- Determinants predicting the electronic medical record adoption in healthcare: A SEM-Artificial Neural Network approach.PloS one · 2022Article
- Classification of Electronic Health Record-Related Patient Safety Incidents: Development and Validation Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2021Article
- Physician Stress During Electronic Health Record Inbox Work: In Situ Measurement With Wearable Sensors.JMIR medical informatics · 2021Article
- Electronic health records, communication, and data sharing: challenges and opportunities for improving the diagnostic process.Diagnosis (Berlin, Germany) · 2019Article
- Experienced time pressure and stress: electronic health records usability and information technology competence play a role.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2019Article
- An assessment of the quality of clinical records in elective orthopaedics using the STAR score.Irish journal of medical science · 2019Article
- EHR-related medication errors in two ICUs.Journal of healthcare risk management : the journal of the American Society for Healthcare Risk Management · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe rapid expansion in the use of electronic health records (EHR) has increased the number of medical errors originating in health information systems (HIS). The sociotechnical approach helps in understanding risks in the development, implementation, and use of EHR and health information technology (HIT) while accounting for complex interactions of technology within the health care system.
objectiveThis study addresses two important questions: (1) "which of the common EHR error types are associated with perceived high- and extreme-risk severity ratings among EHR users?", and (2) "which variables are associated with high- and extreme-risk severity ratings?"
methodsThis study was a quantitative, non-experimental, descriptive study of EHR users. We conducted a cross-sectional web-based questionnaire study at the largest hospital district in Finland. Statistical tests included the reliability of the summative scales tested with Cronbach's alpha. Logistic regression served to assess the association of the independent variables to each of the eight risk factors examined.
resultsA total of 2864 eligible respondents provided the final data. Almost half of the respondents reported a high level of risk related to the error type "extended EHR unavailability". The lowest overall risk level was associated with "selecting incorrectly from a list of items". In multivariate analyses, profession and clinical unit proved to be the strongest predictors for high perceived risk. Physicians perceived risk levels to be the highest ( P<.001 in six of eight error types), while emergency departments, operating rooms, and procedure units were associated with higher perceived risk levels ( P<.001 in four of eight error types). Previous participation in eLearning courses on EHR-use was associated with lower risk for some of the risk factors.
conclusionsBased on a large number of Finnish EHR users in hospitals, this study indicates that HIT safety hazards should be taken very seriously, particularly in operating rooms, procedure units, emergency departments, and intensive care units/critical care units. Health care organizations should use proactive and systematic assessments of EHR risks before harmful events occur. An EHR training program should be compulsory for all EHR users in order to address EHR safety concerns resulting from the failure to use HIT appropriately.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.