Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27154589›Full record

ArticleThe FEBS journal2016

NMR in structural genomics to increase structural coverage of the protein universe: Delivered by Prof. Kurt Wüthrich on 7 July 2013 at the 38th FEBS Congress in St. Petersburg, Russia.

Pedro Serrano, Samit K Dutta, Andrew Proudfoot, Biswaranjan Mohanty, Lukas Susac, Bryan Martin, Michael Geralt, Lukasz Jaroszewski, Adam Godzik, Marc Elsliger and 2 more

Abstract readLecture
In one paragraph

Article in The FEBS journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Pedro SerranoJoint Center for Structural Genomics, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Samit K DuttaJoint Center for Structural Genomics, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Andrew ProudfootJoint Center for Structural Genomics, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Biswaranjan MohantyJoint Center for Structural Genomics, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Lukas SusacJoint Center for Structural Genomics, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Bryan MartinJoint Center for Structural Genomics, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Michael GeraltJoint Center for Structural Genomics, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Lukasz JaroszewskiJoint Center for Structural Genomics, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Adam GodzikJoint Center for Structural Genomics, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Marc ElsligerJoint Center for Structural Genomics, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Ian A WilsonJoint Center for Structural Genomics, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Kurt WüthrichJoint Center for Structural Genomics, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA.

Funding

Structure Determination Core at SSRLU54GM094586 · NIGMS · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI HODGSON, KEITH O · 2010 to 2014
$40.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM094586
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For more than a decade, the Joint Center for Structural Genomics (JCSG; www.jcsg.org) worked toward increased three-dimensional structure coverage of the protein universe. This coordinated quest was one of the main goals of the four high-throughput (HT) structure determination centers of the Protein Structure Initiative (PSI; www.nigms.nih.gov/Research/specificareas/PSI). To achieve the goals of the PSI, the JCSG made use of the complementarity of structure determination by X-ray crystallography and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy to increase and diversify the range of targets entering the HT structure determination pipeline. The overall strategy, for both techniques, was to determine atomic resolution structures for representatives of large protein families, as defined by the Pfam database, which had no structural coverage and could make significant contributions to biological and biomedical research. Furthermore, the experimental structures could be leveraged by homology modeling to further expand the structural coverage of the protein universe and increase biological insights. Here, we describe what could be achieved by this structural genomics approach, using as an illustration the contributions from 20 NMR structure determinations out of a total of 98 JCSG NMR structures, which were selected because they are the first three-dimensional structure representations of the respective Pfam protein families. The information from this small sample is representative for the overall results from crystal and NMR structure determination in the JCSG. There are five new folds, which were classified as domains of unknown functions (DUF), three of the proteins could be functionally annotated based on three-dimensional structure similarity with previously characterized proteins, and 12 proteins showed only limited similarity with previous deposits in the Protein Data Bank (PDB) and were classified as DUFs.

Indexed as

AnimalsComputational BiologyCrystallography, X-RayDatabases, ProteinGenomicsHumansMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyModels, MolecularProteinsProtein Structure, SecondaryProtein Structure, TertiaryProteomicsProteinsdomains of unknown functionJoint Center for Structural GenomicsProtein Structure Initiativeprotein structuresstructural coverage of Pfam protein families

Identifiers

PMID27154589
PMCPMC5099109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.