Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27154476›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2016

Effectiveness of the Baby Friendly Community Initiative in Italy: a non-randomised controlled study.

Adriano Cattaneo, Maria Enrica Bettinelli, Elise Chapin, Anna Macaluso, Lílian Córdova do Espírito Santo, Anna Maria Murante, Marcella Montico, BFCI Study Group

Abstract readControlled Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Breastfeeding trends, influences, and perceptions among Italian women: a qualitative study.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Adriano CattaneoHealth Services Research and International Health, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy.
Maria Enrica BettinelliMaternal and Child Health Unit, Department of Primary Care, Local Health Authority, Milan, Italy.
Elise ChapinBaby Friendly Initiatives, Italian Committee for UNICEF, Rome, Italy.
Anna MacalusoHealth Services Research and International Health, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy.
Lílian Córdova do Espírito SantoNational Council for Technological and Scientific Development, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Anna Maria MuranteManagement and Health Laboratory, Institute of Management, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa, Italy.
Marcella MonticoDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy.
BFCI Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the effectiveness of the Baby Friendly Community Initiative (BFCI) on exclusive breast feeding at 6 months.

designControlled, non-randomised trial.

setting18 Local Health Authorities in 9 regions of Italy.

participants5094 mother/infant dyads in 3 cohorts were followed up to 12 months after birth in 3 rounds of data collection: at baseline, after implementation of the intervention in the early intervention group and after implementation in the late intervention group. 689 (14%) dyads did not complete the study.

interventionImplementation of the 7 steps of the BFCI.

main outcome measuresThe rate of exclusive breast feeding at 6 months was the primary outcome; breast feeding at discharge, 3 and 12 months was also measured.

resultsThe crude rates of exclusive breast feeding at discharge, 3 and 6 months, and of any breast feeding at 6 and 12 months increased at each round of data collection after baseline in the early and late intervention groups. At the end of the project, 10% of infants were exclusively breast fed at 6 months and 38% were continuing to breast feed at 12 months. However, the comparison by adjusted rates and logistic regression failed to show statistically significant differences between groups and rounds of data collection in the intention-to-treat analysis, as well as when compliance with the intervention and training coverage was taken into account.

conclusionsThe study failed to demonstrate an effect of the BFCI on the rates of breast feeding. This may be due, among other factors, to the time needed to observe an effect on breast feeding following this complex intervention.

Indexed as

Health PolicyMothersSocial SupportAdultBreast FeedingCommunity ParticipationFemaleHealth PromotionHumansInfantInfant CareInfant, NewbornInfant Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaItalyMaleMaternal Health ServicesBaby-Friendly InitiativesBreastfeedingItaly

Identifiers

PMID27154476
PMCPMC4861096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.