Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27154416›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of steroid biochemistry and molecular biology2017

Characterization of patient-derived tumor xenografts (PDXs) as models for estrogen receptor positive (ER+HER2- and ER+HER2+) breast cancers.

Noriko Kanaya, George Somlo, Jun Wu, Paul Frankel, Masaya Kai, Xueli Liu, Shang Victoria Wu, Duc Nguyen, Nymph Chan, Meng-Yin Hsieh and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of steroid biochemistry and molecular biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. SRC IncreasesMolecular and cellular biology · 2018
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Noriko KanayaDepartment of Cancer Biology, City of Hope, 1500 E. Duarte Rd., Duarte, CA 91010, USA.
George SomloDepartment of Medical Oncology, City of Hope, 1500 E. Duarte Rd., Duarte, CA, 91010, USA.
Jun WuDepartment of Comparative Medicine, City of Hope, 1500 E. Duarte Rd., Duarte, CA, 91010, USA.
Paul FrankelDepartment of Information Sciences, City of Hope, 1500 E. Duarte Rd., Duarte, CA, 91010, USA.
Masaya KaiDepartment of Cancer Biology, City of Hope, 1500 E. Duarte Rd., Duarte, CA 91010, USA.
Xueli LiuDepartment of Information Sciences, City of Hope, 1500 E. Duarte Rd., Duarte, CA, 91010, USA.
Shang Victoria WuDepartment of Cancer Biology, City of Hope, 1500 E. Duarte Rd., Duarte, CA 91010, USA.
Duc NguyenDepartment of Cancer Biology, City of Hope, 1500 E. Duarte Rd., Duarte, CA 91010, USA.
Nymph ChanDepartment of Cancer Biology, City of Hope, 1500 E. Duarte Rd., Duarte, CA 91010, USA.
Meng-Yin HsiehDepartment of Comparative Medicine, City of Hope, 1500 E. Duarte Rd., Duarte, CA, 91010, USA.
Michele KirschenbaumClinical Trials Office, City of Hope, 1500 E. Duarte Rd., Duarte, CA, 91010, USA.
Laura KruperDepartment of Surgery, City of Hope, 1500 E. Duarte Rd., Duarte, CA, 91010, USA.
Courtney VitoDepartment of Surgery, City of Hope, 1500 E. Duarte Rd., Duarte, CA, 91010, USA.
Behnam BadieDepartment of Surgery, City of Hope, 1500 E. Duarte Rd., Duarte, CA, 91010, USA.
John H YimDepartment of Surgery, City of Hope, 1500 E. Duarte Rd., Duarte, CA, 91010, USA.
Yuan YuanDepartment of Medical Oncology, City of Hope, 1500 E. Duarte Rd., Duarte, CA, 91010, USA.
Arti HurriaDepartment of Medical Oncology, City of Hope, 1500 E. Duarte Rd., Duarte, CA, 91010, USA.
Chu PeiguoDepartment of Pathology, City of Hope, 1500 E. Duarte Rd., Duarte, CA 91010, USA.
Joanne MortimerDepartment of Medical Oncology, City of Hope, 1500 E. Duarte Rd., Duarte, CA, 91010, USA.
Shiuan ChenDepartment of Cancer Biology, City of Hope, 1500 E. Duarte Rd., Duarte, CA 91010, USA. Electronic address: schen@coh.org.
City of Hope · USCity Of Hope National Medical Center · US

Funding

Transgenic Mouse FacilityP30CA033572 · NCI · CITY OF HOPE/BECKMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI STANLEY R. HAMILTON · 1985 to 2026
$86.3M
AROMATASE AND BREAST CANCERR01CA044735 · NCI · CITY OF HOPE/BECKMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI CHEN, SHIUAN · 1988 to 2009
$4.0M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA033572NCI NIH HHS R01 CA044735
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The research was to appraise the utility of the patient-derived tumor xenografts (PDXs) as models of estrogen receptor positive (ER+HER2- and ER+HER2+) breast cancers. We compared protein expression profiles by Reverse Phase Protein Array (RPPA) in tumors that resulted in PDXs compared to those that did not. Our overall PDX intake rate for ER+ breast cancer was 9% (9/97). The intake rate for ER+HER2+ tumors (3/16, 19%) was higher than for ER+HER2- tumors (6/81, 7%). Heat map analyses of RPPA data showed that ER+HER2- tumors were divided into 2 groups by luminal A/B signature [protein expression of ER, AR, Bcl-2, Bim (BCL2L11), GATA3 and INPP4b], and this expression signature was also associated with the rate of PDX intake. Cell survival pathways such as the PI3K/AKT signaling and RAS/ERK pathways were more activated in the specimens that could be established as PDX in both classes. Expression of the ER protein itself may have a bearing on the potential success of an ER+ PDX model. In addition, HER2 and its downstream protein expressions were up-regulated in the ER+HER2+ patient tumors that were successfully established as PDX models. Moreover, the comparison of RPPA data between original and PDX tumors suggested that the selection/adaptation process required to grow the tumors in mice is unavoidable for generation of ER+ PDX models, and we identified differences between patient tumor samples and paired PDX tumors. A better understanding of the biological characteristics of ER+PDX would be the key to using PDX models in assessing treatment strategies in a preclinical setting.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalAnimalsBreast NeoplasmsErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHeterograftsHumansMiceMice, Inbred NODMice, NudeMice, SCIDProtein Array AnalysisReceptors, EstrogenTranscriptomeXenograft Model Antitumor AssaysErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesReceptors, EstrogenBreast cancerER+HER2+ER+HER2−Luminal A/BPatient-derived tumor xenografts (PDXs)

Identifiers

PMID27154416
PMCPMC5094906
OpenAlexW2345684554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.