Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27154280›Full record

ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2017

What is the optimal valgus pre-set for intramedullary femoral alignment rods in total knee arthroplasty?

G Maderbacher, A Keshmiri, J Schaumburger, F Zeman, A M Birkenbach, B Craiovan, J Grifka, C Baier

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Rotation of intramedullary alignment rods affects distal femoral cutting plane in total knee arthroplasty.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2018
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

G MaderbacherDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Regensburg, Kaiser-Karl-V Allee 3, 93077, Bad Abbach, Germany. Guenther.Maderbacher@klinik.uni-regensburg.de.
A KeshmiriDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Regensburg, Kaiser-Karl-V Allee 3, 93077, Bad Abbach, Germany.
J SchaumburgerDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Regensburg, Kaiser-Karl-V Allee 3, 93077, Bad Abbach, Germany.
F ZemanCenter of Clinical Studies, University Medical Center Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauß-Allee 11, 93053, Regensburg, Germany.
A M BirkenbachDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Regensburg, Kaiser-Karl-V Allee 3, 93077, Bad Abbach, Germany.
B CraiovanDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Regensburg, Kaiser-Karl-V Allee 3, 93077, Bad Abbach, Germany.
J GrifkaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Regensburg, Kaiser-Karl-V Allee 3, 93077, Bad Abbach, Germany.
C BaierDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Regensburg, Kaiser-Karl-V Allee 3, 93077, Bad Abbach, Germany.
University Hospital Regensburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn total knee arthroplasty (TKA), intramedullary guides are often used for aligning the distal femoral cutting block. Because of the highly varying angles between the mechanical axis and the anatomical femoral axis (AMA), different valgus pre-sets have been recommended. The present study investigated the optimal valgus pre-set (measuring the AMA in long-leg radiographs or at 5°, 6°, 7° or 8° valgus) to align the cutting block perpendicularly to the mechanical axis.

methodsThe AMA was preoperatively measured in weight-bearing long-leg radiographs. After alignment of the cutting block by means of an intramedullary rod, deviation of the block from the mechanical femoral axis was measured with a pinless navigation device. The true AMA (tAMA) was calculated by adding the valgus pre-set of the alignment rod to the deviation measured with the navigation device. Mean deviations between the tAMA and (a) the AMA measured by the surgeon, (b) the AMA calculated with the computer software, (c) 5°, (d) 6°, (e) 7° and (f) 8° valgus pre-sets were measured for each patient. The lowest mean differences were determined.

resultsThe 40 knees measured showed a mean tAMA of 7.2° valgus (1.7 SD) (range 4°-11.5°). The following mean differences and 95 % limits of agreement were calculated: 2.2 (-1.2, 5.5) to the tAMA for the 5° valgus pre-set, 1.2 (-2.2, 4.5) for 6°, 0.2 (-3.2, 3.5) for 7° and -0.8 (-4.2, 2.5) for 8°. AMA measurements by the surgeon and with the digital medical planning software yielded mean differences of 0.6 (-3.1, 4.3) and 0.4 (-4.1, 4.8), respectively.

conclusionIn the present setting, the best mean distal femoral cutting block alignment perpendicular to the mechanical femoral axis could be achieved with a valgus pre-set of 7° and not by measuring the AMA. Nevertheless, we recommend conducting weight-bearing radiographs of the entire leg prior to TKA for easy detection of any anatomical varieties, old fractures, long stems of total hip arthroplasties or cement. However, surgeons must be aware that exact coronal component alignment can only be achieved by navigational devices. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic study, Level II.

Indexed as

AgedArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeBone MalalignmentBone NailsFemaleFemurHumansMaleMiddle AgedOsteoarthritis, KneeAlignmentCutting blockFemurIntramedullary alignmentNavigationPinlessRodTKATotal knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID27154280
OpenAlexW2346820099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.