Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27154219›Full record

ArticleClinical neuroradiology2018

Posterior fossa brain arteriovenous malformations : Clinical features and outcomes of endovascular embolization, adjuvant microsurgery and radiosurgery.

Ling-Feng Lai, Jia-Xiang Chen, Kuang Zheng, Xu-Ying He, Xi-Feng Li, Xin Zhang, Qiu-Jing Wang, Chuan-Zhi Duan, Min Chen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical neuroradiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Predictors of angiographic occlusion after embolization of intracranial arteriovenous malformations with curative intent.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ling-Feng LaiThe National Key Clinical Specialty, The Engineering Technology Research Center of Education Ministry of China, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory on Brain Function Repair and Regeneration, Department of Neurosurgery, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, 510282, Guangzhou, China.
Jia-Xiang ChenThe National Key Clinical Specialty, The Engineering Technology Research Center of Education Ministry of China, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory on Brain Function Repair and Regeneration, Department of Neurosurgery, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, 510282, Guangzhou, China.
Kuang ZhengThe National Key Clinical Specialty, The Engineering Technology Research Center of Education Ministry of China, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory on Brain Function Repair and Regeneration, Department of Neurosurgery, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, 510282, Guangzhou, China.
Xu-Ying HeThe National Key Clinical Specialty, The Engineering Technology Research Center of Education Ministry of China, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory on Brain Function Repair and Regeneration, Department of Neurosurgery, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, 510282, Guangzhou, China.
Xi-Feng LiThe National Key Clinical Specialty, The Engineering Technology Research Center of Education Ministry of China, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory on Brain Function Repair and Regeneration, Department of Neurosurgery, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, 510282, Guangzhou, China.
Xin ZhangThe National Key Clinical Specialty, The Engineering Technology Research Center of Education Ministry of China, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory on Brain Function Repair and Regeneration, Department of Neurosurgery, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, 510282, Guangzhou, China.
Qiu-Jing WangThe National Key Clinical Specialty, The Engineering Technology Research Center of Education Ministry of China, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory on Brain Function Repair and Regeneration, Department of Neurosurgery, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, 510282, Guangzhou, China.
Chuan-Zhi DuanThe National Key Clinical Specialty, The Engineering Technology Research Center of Education Ministry of China, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory on Brain Function Repair and Regeneration, Department of Neurosurgery, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, 510282, Guangzhou, China. duanchuanz@163.com.
Min ChenThe National Key Clinical Specialty, The Engineering Technology Research Center of Education Ministry of China, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory on Brain Function Repair and Regeneration, Department of Neurosurgery, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, 510282, Guangzhou, China.
Southern Medical University · CNZhujiang Hospital · CN

Funding

The Guangdong Provincial Clinical Medical Centre for Neurosurgery 2013B020400005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPosterior fossa brain arteriovenous malformations (PFbAVM) are relatively rare brain disorders but have a high risk of hemorrhage. Endovascular embolization to reduce the lesion size before treatment may improve the outcome of PFbAVM. The purposes of this study were to identify risk factors associated with hemorrhage in PFbAVM and to assess clinical outcomes in patients receiving initial endovascular embolization. MATERIAL AND

methodsFrom 1999 to 2013 a total of 63 patients with PFbAVMs were treated (31 males and 32 females, 14.1 % of all AVM cases). A retrospective examination of patient demographics, clinical presentation, angiographic features, treatment modalities, complications and outcomes was carried out. The re-hemorrhage rate, obliteration rate and modified Rankin scale (MRS) were used as measures of outcome.

resultsOf the 63 PFbAVM patients 54 (85.7 %) exhibited hemorrhage and 15 had confirmed aneurysms. The cerebellar location (P = 0.007) and deep venous drainage (P = 0.012) were independent predictors of hemorrhage in multivariate analyses. The mean estimated devascularization was 46.9 % (range 10-100 %) in the 20 patients (31.7 %) treated by endovascular embolization. The 16 patients with residual niduses were further treated by radiosurgery, microsurgery or embolization. Complete obliteration was attained in 12 patients (67 %) while 2 (5.7 %) were left with persisting neurological deficits and 1 had a re-hemorrhage 3 years later (annual rate of 4.6 %). Favorable outcome (MRS ≤ 2) was obtained in the 20 patients receiving initial endovascular embolization (P = 0.039 versus preoperative MRS).

conclusionCerebellar location and deep venous drainage are predictors of hemorrhage in PFbAVM. Adjuvant endovascular embolization is useful and safe for PFbAVM prior to microsurgery or radiosurgery.

Indexed as

MicrosurgeryTreatment OutcomeAdolescentAdultAgedChildChild, PreschoolEmbolization, TherapeuticFemaleHumansIntracranial Arteriovenous MalformationsMaleMiddle AgedRadiosurgeryRetrospective StudiesYoung AdultCerebral hemorrhageEndovascular embolizationIntracranial aneurysmOutcomeRetrospective study

Identifiers

PMID27154219
OpenAlexW2346015107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.