ReviewCellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS2016
Methodologies in creating skin substitutes.
Review in Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Advancements in cell-based therapies for thermal burn wounds: a comprehensive systematic review of clinical trials outcomes.Stem cell research & therapy · 2024Pooled it
- Arginine-Biofunctionalized Ternary Hydrogel Scaffolds of Carboxymethyl Cellulose-Chitosan-Polyvinyl Alcohol to Deliver Cell Therapy for Wound Healing.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Characterization and biocompatibility evaluation of acellular rat skin scaffolds for skin tissue engineering applications.Cell and tissue banking · 2024Article
- Engineered Vasculogenic Extracellular Vesicles Drive Nonviral Direct Conversions of Human Dermal Fibroblasts into Induced Endothelial Cells and Improve Wound Closure.Advanced therapeutics · 2023Article
- Rotary Jet Spinning (RJS): A Key Process to Produce Biopolymeric Wound Dressings.Pharmaceutics · 2022Review
- Administration Methods of Mesenchymal Stem Cells in the Treatment of Burn Wounds.European burn journal · 2022Review
- Epidermolysis Bullosa: A Review of the Tissue-Engineered Skin Substitutes Used to Treat Wounds.Molecular diagnosis & therapy · 2022Review
- Article
- Rational Design of Immunomodulatory Hydrogels for Chronic Wound Healing.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2021Review
- Quantitative Photothermal Characterization with Bioprinted 3D Complex Tissue Constructs for Early-Stage Breast Cancer Therapy Using Gold Nanorods.Advanced healthcare materials · 2021Article
- Cutaneous Wound Healing: An Update from Physiopathology to Current Therapies.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Synergistic Effect of Biomaterial and Stem Cell for Skin Tissue Engineering in Cutaneous Wound Healing: A Concise Review.Polymers · 2021Review
- 3D Bioprinting of Functional Skin Substitutes: From Current Achievements to Future Goals.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Dermatillomania: Strategies for Developing Protective Biomaterials/Cloth.Pharmaceutics · 2021Review
- Hybrid Collagen Hydrogel/Chondroitin-4-Sulphate Fortified with Dermal Fibroblast Conditioned Medium for Skin Therapeutic Application.Polymers · 2021Article
- Cytotoxicity and Epidermal Barrier Function Evaluation of Common Antiseptics for Clinical Use in an Artificial Autologous Skin Model.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
- Fabrication of Bio-Based Gelatin Sponge for Potential Use as A Functional Acellular Skin Substitute.Polymers · 2020Article
- From Grafts to Human Bioengineered Vascularized Skin Substitutes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- From Food Waste to Innovative Biomaterial: Sea Urchin-Derived Collagen for Applications in Skin Regenerative Medicine.Marine drugs · 2020Article
- Artificial dermal substitutes for tissue regeneration: comparison of the clinical outcomes and histological findings of two templates.The Journal of international medical research · 2020Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The creation of skin substitutes has significantly decreased morbidity and mortality of skin wounds. Although there are still a number of disadvantages of currently available skin substitutes, there has been a significant decline in research advances over the past several years in improving these skin substitutes. Clinically most skin substitutes used are acellular and do not use growth factors to assist wound healing, key areas of potential in this field of research. This article discusses the five necessary attributes of an ideal skin substitute. It comprehensively discusses the three major basic components of currently available skin substitutes: scaffold materials, growth factors, and cells, comparing and contrasting what has been used so far. It then examines a variety of techniques in how to incorporate these basic components together to act as a guide for further research in the field to create cellular skin substitutes with better clinical results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.