Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27153851›Full record

ArticleJournal of endocrinological investigation2016

Usefulness of an ad hoc questionnaire (Acro-CQ) for the systematic assessment of acromegaly comorbidities at diagnosis and their management at follow-up.

F Guaraldi, D Gori, G Beccuti, N Prencipe, R Giordano, Y Mints, V S Di Giacomo, A Berton, M Lorente, V Gasco and 3 more

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of endocrinological investigation, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The acromegaly patient experience: burden of treatment and quality of life.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Auditory changes in acromegaly.Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

F GuaraldiDivision of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Corso Dogliotti, 14, 10126, Turin, Italy. federica.guaraldi@unito.it.
D GoriDepartment of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, DIBINEM, University of Bologna, 40126, Bologna, Italy.
G BeccutiDivision of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Corso Dogliotti, 14, 10126, Turin, Italy.
N PrencipeDivision of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Corso Dogliotti, 14, 10126, Turin, Italy.
R GiordanoDivision of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Corso Dogliotti, 14, 10126, Turin, Italy.
Y MintsDivision of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, Pituitary Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
V S Di GiacomoDivision of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Corso Dogliotti, 14, 10126, Turin, Italy.
A BertonDivision of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Corso Dogliotti, 14, 10126, Turin, Italy.
M LorenteDivision of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Corso Dogliotti, 14, 10126, Turin, Italy.
V GascoDivision of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Corso Dogliotti, 14, 10126, Turin, Italy.
E GhigoDivision of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Corso Dogliotti, 14, 10126, Turin, Italy.
R SalvatoriDivision of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, Pituitary Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
S GrottoliDivision of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Corso Dogliotti, 14, 10126, Turin, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine the validity of a self-administered questionnaire (Acro-CQ) developed to systematically assess the presence, type and time of onset of acromegaly comorbidities.

methodsThis is a cross-sectional study; 105 acromegaly patients and 147 controls with other types of pituitary adenoma, referred to a specialized Italian Center, autonomously compiled Acro-CQ in an outpatient clinical setting. To test its reliability in a different setting, Acro-CQ was administered via mail to 78 patients with acromegaly and 100 with other pituitary adenomas, referred to a specialized US Center. Data obtained from questionnaires in both settings were compared with medical records (gold standard).

resultsDemographics of patients and controls from both countries were similar. In both settings, >95 % of the questionnaires were completely filled; only one item was missed in the others. Concordance with medical record was excellent (k > 0.85) for most of the items, independently from the way of administration, patient age, gender and nationality, pituitary adenoma type and disease activity.

conclusionsAcro-CQ is an inexpensive, highly accepted from patients and reliable tool recommended to expedite systematic collection of relevant clinical data in acromegaly at diagnosis, to be replicated at follow-ups. This tool may guide a targeted, cost-effective management of complications. Moreover, it could be applied to retrieve data for survey studies in both acromegaly and other pituitary adenomas, as information is easily and rapidly accessible for statistical analysis.

Indexed as

AcromegalyBiomarkersCase-Control StudiesComorbidityCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPituitary NeoplasmsSurveys and QuestionnairesBiomarkersAcromegalyComorbiditiesComplicationsPituitary adenomaQuestionnaire validity

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.