Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27153832›Full record

ArticleImplementation science : IS2016

Using intervention mapping to develop a home-based parental-supervised toothbrushing intervention for young children.

K A Gray-Burrows, P F Day, Z Marshman, E Aliakbari, S L Prady, R R C McEachan

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science : IS, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05362461 (Diagnostic Ability of Near Infrared Transillumination), which is not on this map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05362461 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Diagnostic Ability of Near Infrared Transillumination (NIRT, CariVu™) for Detecting Interproximal Caries as Compared to Conventional Bitewing Radiographs

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of Colorado, DenverRan2022 to 2023Enrolled50ConditionsCaries,DentalArmsNear Infrared Transillumination
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

K A Gray-BurrowsSchool of Dentistry, Clarendon Way, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK. K.Gray-Burrows@leeds.ac.uk.
P F DaySchool of Dentistry, Clarendon Way, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
Z MarshmanSchool of Clinical Dentistry, Claremont Crescent, Sheffield, S10 2TA, UK.
E AliakbariSchool of Dentistry, Clarendon Way, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
S L PradyDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
R R C McEachanBradford Institute for Health Research, Duckworth Lane, Bradford, BD9 6RJ, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDental caries in young children is a major public health problem impacting on the child and their family in terms of pain, infection and substantial financial burden on healthcare funders. In the UK, national guidance on the prevention of dental caries advises parents to supervise their child's brushing with fluoride toothpaste until age 7. However, there is a dearth of evidence-based interventions to encourage this practice in parents. The current study used intervention mapping (IM) to develop a home-based parental-supervised toothbrushing intervention to reduce dental caries in young children.

methodsThe intervention was developed using the six key stages of the IM protocol: (1) needs assessment, including a systematic review, qualitative interviews, and meetings with a multi-disciplinary intervention development group; (2) identification of outcomes and change objectives following identification of the barriers to parental-supervised toothbrushing (PSB), mapped alongside psychological determinants outlined in the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF); (3) selection of methods and practical strategies; (4) production of a programme plan; (5) adoption and implementation and (6) Evaluation.

resultsThe comprehensive needs assessment highlighted key barriers to PSB, such as knowledge, skills, self-efficacy, routine setting and behaviour regulation and underlined the importance of individual, social and structural influences. Parenting skills (routine setting and the ability to manage the behaviour of a reluctant child) were emphasised as critical to the success of PSB. The multi-disciplinary intervention development group highlighted the need for both universal and targeted programmes, which could be implemented within current provision. Two intervention pathways were developed: a lower cost universal pathway utilising an existing national programme and an intensive targeted programme delivered via existing parenting programmes. A training manual was created to accompany each intervention to ensure knowledge and standardise implementation procedures.

conclusionsPSB is a complex behaviour and requires intervention across individual, social and structural levels. IM, although a time-consuming process, allowed us to capture this complexity and allowed us to develop two community-based intervention pathways covering both universal and targeted approaches, which can be integrated into current provision. Further research is needed to evaluate the acceptability and sustainability of these interventions.

Indexed as

ParentsAdultChildChild, PreschoolDental CariesFemaleHumansMaleProgram EvaluationToothbrushingChildrenIntervention mappingParentsToothbrushing

Identifiers

PMID27153832
PMCPMC4859968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.