ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2016
Efficient privacy-preserving string search and an application in genomics.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- KmerCrypt: private k-mer search with homomorphic encryption.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Learning-augmented sketching offers improved performance for privacy preserving and secure GWAS.iScience · 2025Article
- Proxy panels enable privacy-aware outsourcing of genotype imputation.Genome research · 2025Article
- Learning-Augmented Sketching Offers Improved Performance for Privacy Preserving and Secure GWAS.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- μ- PBWT: a lightweight r-indexing of the PBWT for storing and querying UK Biobank data.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- Parallel and private generalized suffix tree construction and query on genomic data.BMC genomic data · 2022Article
- Efficient privacy-preserving variable-length substring match for genome sequence.Algorithms for molecular biology : AMB · 2022Article
- A secure system for genomics clinical decision support.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2020Article
- Privately computing set-maximal matches in genomic data.BMC medical genomics · 2020Article
- iDASH secure genome analysis competition 2018: blockchain genomic data access logging, homomorphic encryption on GWAS, and DNA segment searching.BMC medical genomics · 2020Article
- Privacy-preserving techniques of genomic data-a survey.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2019Review
- Private and Efficient Query Processing on Outsourced Genomic Databases.IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics · 2017Article
- Secure approximation of edit distance on genomic data.BMC medical genomics · 2017Article
- PRINCESS: Privacy-protecting Rare disease International Network Collaboration via Encryption through Software guard extensionS.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationPersonal genomes carry inherent privacy risks and protecting privacy poses major social and technological challenges. We consider the case where a user searches for genetic information (e.g. an allele) on a server that stores a large genomic database and aims to receive allele-associated information. The user would like to keep the query and result private and the server the database. APPROACH: We propose a novel approach that combines efficient string data structures such as the Burrows-Wheeler transform with cryptographic techniques based on additive homomorphic encryption. We assume that the sequence data is searchable in efficient iterative query operations over a large indexed dictionary, for instance, from large genome collections and employing the (positional) Burrows-Wheeler transform. We use a technique called oblivious transfer that is based on additive homomorphic encryption to conceal the sequence query and the genomic region of interest in positional queries.
resultsWe designed and implemented an efficient algorithm for searching sequences of SNPs in large genome databases. During search, the user can only identify the longest match while the server does not learn which sequence of SNPs the user queried. In an experiment based on 2184 aligned haploid genomes from the 1000 Genomes Project, our algorithm was able to perform typical queries within [Formula: see text] 4.6 s and [Formula: see text] 10.8 s for client and server side, respectively, on laptop computers. The presented algorithm is at least one order of magnitude faster than an exhaustive baseline algorithm. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: https://github.com/iskana/PBWT-sec and https://github.com/ratschlab/PBWT-sec CONTACTS: shimizu-kana@aist.go.jp or Gunnar.Ratsch@ratschlab.org SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.