Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27153719›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2016

MetaKTSP: a meta-analytic top scoring pair method for robust cross-study validation of omics prediction analysis.

SungHwan Kim, Chien-Wei Lin, George C Tseng

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Topic Evolution Analysis for Omics Data Integration in Cancers.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Integrative Deep Learning for Identifying Differentially Expressed (DE) Biomarkers.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

SungHwan KimDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA Department of Statistics, Korea University, Seoul, South Korea.
Chien-Wei LinDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
George C TsengDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA Department of Computational and Systems Biology Department of Human Genetics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationSupervised machine learning is widely applied to transcriptomic data to predict disease diagnosis, prognosis or survival. Robust and interpretable classifiers with high accuracy are usually favored for their clinical and translational potential. The top scoring pair (TSP) algorithm is an example that applies a simple rank-based algorithm to identify rank-altered gene pairs for classifier construction. Although many classification methods perform well in cross-validation of single expression profile, the performance usually greatly reduces in cross-study validation (i.e. the prediction model is established in the training study and applied to an independent test study) for all machine learning methods, including TSP. The failure of cross-study validation has largely diminished the potential translational and clinical values of the models. The purpose of this article is to develop a meta-analytic top scoring pair (MetaKTSP) framework that combines multiple transcriptomic studies and generates a robust prediction model applicable to independent test studies.

resultsWe proposed two frameworks, by averaging TSP scores or by combining P-values from individual studies, to select the top gene pairs for model construction. We applied the proposed methods in simulated data sets and three large-scale real applications in breast cancer, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and pan-cancer methylation. The result showed superior performance of cross-study validation accuracy and biomarker selection for the new meta-analytic framework. In conclusion, combining multiple omics data sets in the public domain increases robustness and accuracy of the classification model that will ultimately improve disease understanding and clinical treatment decisions to benefit patients. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: An R package MetaKTSP is available online. (http://tsenglab.biostat.pitt.edu/software.htm). CONTACT: ctseng@pitt.edu SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsGene Expression ProfilingSupervised Machine LearningBreast NeoplasmsDNA MethylationGenomicsHumansIdiopathic Pulmonary FibrosisMeta-Analysis as TopicPrognosisResearch Design

Identifiers

PMID27153719
PMCPMC6280887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.