Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27153689›Full record

SynthesisBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2016

metaCCA: summary statistics-based multivariate meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies using canonical correlation analysis.

Anna Cichonska, Juho Rousu, Pekka Marttinen, Antti J Kangas, Pasi Soininen, Terho Lehtimäki, Olli T Raitakari, Marjo-Riitta Järvelin, Veikko Salomaa, Mika Ala-Korpela and 2 more

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 81 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
81citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

81 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Disentangling the Effect of BMI on Hepatocellular Carcinoma From Cirrhosis With Multivariable Mendelian Randomization.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

21 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Anna CichonskaInstitute for Molecular Medicine Finland FIMM, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland, Helsinki Institute for Information Technology HIIT, Department of Computer Science, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland.
Juho RousuHelsinki Institute for Information Technology HIIT, Department of Computer Science, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland.
Pekka MarttinenHelsinki Institute for Information Technology HIIT, Department of Computer Science, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland.
Antti J KangasComputational Medicine, University of Oulu, Oulu University Hospital and Biocenter Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Pasi SoininenComputational Medicine, University of Oulu, Oulu University Hospital and Biocenter Oulu, Oulu, Finland, NMR Metabolomics Laboratory, School of Pharmacy, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Terho LehtimäkiDepartment of Clinical Chemistry, Fimlab Laboratories, University of Tampere School of Medicine, Tampere, Finland.
Olli T RaitakariDepartment of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland, Research Centre of Applied and Preventive Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Turku and Department of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
Marjo-Riitta JärvelinDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, MRC-PHE Centre for Environment & Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK, Centre for Life Course Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland, Biocenter Oulu, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland, Unit of Primary Care, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland.
Veikko SalomaaNational Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.
Mika Ala-KorpelaComputational Medicine, University of Oulu, Oulu University Hospital and Biocenter Oulu, Oulu, Finland, NMR Metabolomics Laboratory, School of Pharmacy, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland, Computational Medicine, School of Social and Community Medicine and the Medical Research Council Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Samuli RipattiInstitute for Molecular Medicine Finland FIMM, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland, Public Health, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland and Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, UK.
Matti PirinenInstitute for Molecular Medicine Finland FIMM, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_12013/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationA dominant approach to genetic association studies is to perform univariate tests between genotype-phenotype pairs. However, analyzing related traits together increases statistical power, and certain complex associations become detectable only when several variants are tested jointly. Currently, modest sample sizes of individual cohorts, and restricted availability of individual-level genotype-phenotype data across the cohorts limit conducting multivariate tests.

resultsWe introduce metaCCA, a computational framework for summary statistics-based analysis of a single or multiple studies that allows multivariate representation of both genotype and phenotype. It extends the statistical technique of canonical correlation analysis to the setting where original individual-level records are not available, and employs a covariance shrinkage algorithm to achieve robustness.Multivariate meta-analysis of two Finnish studies of nuclear magnetic resonance metabolomics by metaCCA, using standard univariate output from the program SNPTEST, shows an excellent agreement with the pooled individual-level analysis of original data. Motivated by strong multivariate signals in the lipid genes tested, we envision that multivariate association testing using metaCCA has a great potential to provide novel insights from already published summary statistics from high-throughput phenotyping technologies. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Code is available at https://github.com/aalto-ics-kepaco CONTACTS: anna.cichonska@helsinki.fi or matti.pirinen@helsinki.fi SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

Genome-Wide Association StudyMultivariate AnalysisAlgorithmsComputational BiologyGenotypeHumansPhenotypePolymorphism, Single Nucleotide

Identifiers

PMID27153689
PMCPMC4920109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.