ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2016
Assessing statistical significance in multivariable genome wide association analysis.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- A module-based approach for post-omics, post-GWAS network-based gene classification.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Potential application of elastic nets for shared polygenicity detection with adapted threshold selection.The international journal of biostatistics · 2023Article
- A predominant role of genotypic variation in both expression of sperm competition genes and paternity success inProceedings. Biological sciences · 2023Article
- A Novel Multitasking Ant Colony Optimization Method for Detecting Multiorder SNP Interactions.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2022Article
- False discovery rate control in genome-wide association studies with population structure.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021Article
- Genome-wide association study and its applications in the non-model crop Sesamum indicum.BMC plant biology · 2021Review
- Boosting heritability: estimating the genetic component of phenotypic variation with multiple sample splitting.BMC bioinformatics · 2021Article
- Article
- Multi-resolution localization of causal variants across the genome.Nature communications · 2020Article
- CERENKOV3: Clustering and molecular network-derived features improve computational prediction of functional noncoding SNPs.Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing · 2020Article
- Estimation of a significance threshold for genome-wide association studies.BMC genomics · 2019Article
- A multi-marker association method for genome-wide association studies without the need for population structure correction.Nature communications · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationAlthough Genome Wide Association Studies (GWAS) genotype a very large number of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), the data are often analyzed one SNP at a time. The low predictive power of single SNPs, coupled with the high significance threshold needed to correct for multiple testing, greatly decreases the power of GWAS.
resultsWe propose a procedure in which all the SNPs are analyzed in a multiple generalized linear model, and we show its use for extremely high-dimensional datasets. Our method yields P-values for assessing significance of single SNPs or groups of SNPs while controlling for all other SNPs and the family wise error rate (FWER). Thus, our method tests whether or not a SNP carries any additional information about the phenotype beyond that available by all the other SNPs. This rules out spurious correlations between phenotypes and SNPs that can arise from marginal methods because the 'spuriously correlated' SNP merely happens to be correlated with the 'truly causal' SNP. In addition, the method offers a data driven approach to identifying and refining groups of SNPs that jointly contain informative signals about the phenotype. We demonstrate the value of our method by applying it to the seven diseases analyzed by the Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium (WTCCC). We show, in particular, that our method is also capable of finding significant SNPs that were not identified in the original WTCCC study, but were replicated in other independent studies. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Reproducibility of our research is supported by the open-source Bioconductor package hierGWAS. CONTACT: peter.buehlmann@stat.math.ethz.ch SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.