Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27153677›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2016

Assessing statistical significance in multivariable genome wide association analysis.

Laura Buzdugan, Markus Kalisch, Arcadi Navarro, Daniel Schunk, Ernst Fehr, Peter Bühlmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A Novel Multitasking Ant Colony Optimization Method for Detecting Multiorder SNP Interactions.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2022
    Article
  5. False discovery rate control in genome-wide association studies with population structure.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Laura BuzduganSeminar for Statistics, Department of Mathematics, ETH Zürich, Zürich 8092, Switzerland Department of Economics, University of Zürich, Zürich 8006, Switzerland.
Markus KalischSeminar for Statistics, Department of Mathematics, ETH Zürich, Zürich 8092, Switzerland.
Arcadi NavarroInstitute of Evolutionary Biology (CSIC-UPF), Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona 08003, Spain Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ICREA) Center for Genomic Regulation (CRG), Barcelona Biomedical Research Park (PRBB), Barcelona 08003, Spain.
Daniel SchunkDepartment of Economics, University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Ernst FehrDepartment of Economics, University of Zürich, Zürich 8006, Switzerland.
Peter BühlmannSeminar for Statistics, Department of Mathematics, ETH Zürich, Zürich 8092, Switzerland.

Funding

European Research Council 295642Wellcome Trust 076113
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationAlthough Genome Wide Association Studies (GWAS) genotype a very large number of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), the data are often analyzed one SNP at a time. The low predictive power of single SNPs, coupled with the high significance threshold needed to correct for multiple testing, greatly decreases the power of GWAS.

resultsWe propose a procedure in which all the SNPs are analyzed in a multiple generalized linear model, and we show its use for extremely high-dimensional datasets. Our method yields P-values for assessing significance of single SNPs or groups of SNPs while controlling for all other SNPs and the family wise error rate (FWER). Thus, our method tests whether or not a SNP carries any additional information about the phenotype beyond that available by all the other SNPs. This rules out spurious correlations between phenotypes and SNPs that can arise from marginal methods because the 'spuriously correlated' SNP merely happens to be correlated with the 'truly causal' SNP. In addition, the method offers a data driven approach to identifying and refining groups of SNPs that jointly contain informative signals about the phenotype. We demonstrate the value of our method by applying it to the seven diseases analyzed by the Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium (WTCCC). We show, in particular, that our method is also capable of finding significant SNPs that were not identified in the original WTCCC study, but were replicated in other independent studies. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Reproducibility of our research is supported by the open-source Bioconductor package hierGWAS. CONTACT: peter.buehlmann@stat.math.ethz.ch SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

Genome-Wide Association StudyPolymorphism, Single NucleotideCluster AnalysisComputational BiologyComputer SimulationGenotypeHumansLinear ModelsPhenotypeReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID27153677
PMCPMC4920127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.