Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27153670›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2017

WeSME: uncovering mutual exclusivity of cancer drivers and beyond.

Yoo-Ah Kim, Sanna Madan, Teresa M Przytycka

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 94 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Using graph-based model to identify cell specific synthetic lethal effects.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023
    Article
  17. Mutations in theInternational journal of general medicine · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yoo-Ah KimNCBI, NLM, NIH, Bethesda, MD, 20894, USA.
Sanna MadanPoolesville High School, Poolesville, 20837 MD, USA.
Teresa M PrzytyckaNCBI, NLM, NIH, Bethesda, MD, 20894, USA.
National Center for Biotechnology Information · US

Funding

Combinatorial and graph theoretical approach to systems biology and mol. evo.ZIALM200887 · NLM · NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE · PI PRZYTYCKA, TERESA · 2009 to 2025
$24.4M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motivation: Mutual exclusivity is a widely recognized property of many cancer drivers. Knowledge about these relationships can provide important insights into cancer drivers, cancer-driving pathways and cancer subtypes. It can also be used to predict new functional interactions between cancer driving genes and uncover novel cancer drivers. Currently, most of mutual exclusivity analyses are preformed focusing on a limited set of genes in part due to the computational cost required to rigorously compute P -values. Results: To reduce the computing cost and perform less restricted mutual exclusivity analysis, we developed an efficient method to estimate P -values while controlling the mutation rates of individual patients and genes similar to the permutation test. A comprehensive mutual exclusivity analysis allowed us to uncover mutually exclusive pairs, some of which may have relatively low mutation rates. These pairs often included likely cancer drivers that have been missed in previous analyses. More importantly, our results demonstrated that mutual exclusivity can also provide information that goes beyond the interactions between cancer drivers and can, for example, elucidate different mutagenic processes in different cancer groups. In particular, including frequently mutated, long genes such as TTN in our analysis allowed us to observe interesting patterns of APOBEC activity in breast cancer and identify a set of related driver genes that are highly predictive of patient survival. In addition, we utilized our mutual exclusivity analysis in support of a previously proposed model where APOBEC activity is the underlying process that causes TP53 mutations in a subset of breast cancer cases. Availability and Implementation: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/CBBresearch/Przytycka/index.cgi#wesme. Contact: przytyck@ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

MutationBreast NeoplasmsComputational BiologyFemaleGenes, NeoplasmHumans

Identifiers

PMID27153670
PMCPMC5888950
OpenAlexW2963382551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.