Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27153620›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2016

MOCAT2: a metagenomic assembly, annotation and profiling framework.

Jens Roat Kultima, Luis Pedro Coelho, Kristoffer Forslund, Jaime Huerta-Cepas, Simone S Li, Marja Driessen, Anita Yvonne Voigt, Georg Zeller, Shinichi Sunagawa, Peer Bork

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 110 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
110citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

110 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Computational Metagenomics: State of the Art.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

50 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jens Roat KultimaStructural and Computational Biology Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany.
Luis Pedro CoelhoStructural and Computational Biology Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany.
Kristoffer ForslundStructural and Computational Biology Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany.
Jaime Huerta-CepasStructural and Computational Biology Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany.
Simone S LiStructural and Computational Biology Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany School of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, University of New South Wales, 2052 Sydney, Australia.
Marja DriessenStructural and Computational Biology Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany.
Anita Yvonne VoigtStructural and Computational Biology Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany Molecular Medicine Partnership Unit, University of Heidelberg and European Molecular Biology Laboratory, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Georg ZellerStructural and Computational Biology Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany.
Shinichi SunagawaStructural and Computational Biology Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany.
Peer BorkStructural and Computational Biology Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany Molecular Medicine Partnership Unit, University of Heidelberg and European Molecular Biology Laboratory, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany Department of Bioinformatics, Biocenter, University of Würzburg, 97074 Würzburg, Germany Max Delbrück Centre for Molecular Medicine, 13125 Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledMOCAT2 is a software pipeline for metagenomic sequence assembly and gene prediction with novel features for taxonomic and functional abundance profiling. The automated generation and efficient annotation of non-redundant reference catalogs by propagating pre-computed assignments from 18 databases covering various functional categories allows for fast and comprehensive functional characterization of metagenomes. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: MOCAT2 is implemented in Perl 5 and Python 2.7, designed for 64-bit UNIX systems and offers support for high-performance computer usage via LSF, PBS or SGE queuing systems; source code is freely available under the GPL3 license at http://mocat.embl.de CONTACT: : bork@embl.de SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

MetagenomicsSoftwareDatabases, FactualMetagenome

Identifiers

PMID27153620
PMCPMC4978931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.