Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27153607›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2016

GenomeRunner web server: regulatory similarity and differences define the functional impact of SNP sets.

Mikhail G Dozmorov, Lukas R Cara, Cory B Giles, Jonathan D Wren

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Fast Context-Aware Analysis of Genome Annotation Colocalization.Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Analytical Approaches for ATAC-seq Data Analysis.Current protocols in human genetics · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mikhail G DozmorovDepartment of Biostatistics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
Lukas R CaraDepartment of Biostatistics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
Cory B GilesDepartment of Arthritis and Clinical Immunology, Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
Jonathan D WrenDepartment of Arthritis and Clinical Immunology, Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City, OK, USA Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.

Funding

SNP Confirmation and High Throughput Genotyping CoreP30AR053483 · NIAMS · OKLAHOMA MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION · PI GUTHRIDGE, JOEL MARVIN · 2007 to 2017
$6.7M
Science in a Culture of MentoringP30GM103510 · NIGMS · OKLAHOMA MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION · PI JAMES, JUDITH A · 2012 to 2016
$3.9M
NIAMS NIH HHS P30 AR053483NIGMS NIH HHS P30 GM103510
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationThe growing amount of regulatory data from the ENCODE, Roadmap Epigenomics and other consortia provides a wealth of opportunities to investigate the functional impact of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Yet, given the large number of regulatory datasets, researchers are posed with a challenge of how to efficiently utilize them to interpret the functional impact of SNP sets.

resultsWe developed the GenomeRunner web server to automate systematic statistical analysis of SNP sets within a regulatory context. Besides defining the functional impact of SNP sets, GenomeRunner implements novel regulatory similarity/differential analyses, and cell type-specific regulatory enrichment analysis. Validated against literature- and disease ontology-based approaches, analysis of 39 disease/trait-associated SNP sets demonstrated that the functional impact of SNP sets corresponds to known disease relationships. We identified a group of autoimmune diseases with SNPs distinctly enriched in the enhancers of T helper cell subpopulations, and demonstrated relevant cell type-specificity of the functional impact of other SNP sets. In summary, we show how systematic analysis of genomic data within a regulatory context can help interpreting the functional impact of SNP sets. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: GenomeRunner web server is freely available at http://www.integrativegenomics.org/ CONTACT: mikhail.dozmorov@gmail.com SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

ComputersPolymorphism, Single NucleotideSoftwareAutomationDatabases, GeneticGenomics

Identifiers

PMID27153607
PMCPMC4965636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.