ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2016
Genome-scale prediction of moonlighting proteins using diverse protein association information.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Early detection of abiotic stress in plants through SNARE proteins using hybrid feature fusion model.PeerJ. Computer science · 2024Article
- Article
- Predictive modeling of moonlighting DNA-binding proteins.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2022Article
- SIN-3 functions through multi-protein interaction to regulate apoptosis, autophagy, and longevity in Caenorhabditis elegans.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- A method for identifying moonlighting proteins based on linear discriminant analysis and bagging-SVM.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Article
- IdentPMP: identification of moonlighting proteins in plants using sequence-based learning models.PeerJ · 2021Article
- Prediction of Protein-Protein Interactions inFrontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- Neighborhood watch: tools for defining locale-dependent subproteomes and their contextual signaling activities.RSC chemical biology · 2020Review
- Multiple Forms of Multifunctional Proteins in Health and Disease.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2020Review
- Understanding protein multifunctionality: from short linear motifs to cellular functions.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2019Review
- Computational identification of protein-protein interactions in model plant proteomes.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Article
- Article
- DextMP: deep dive into text for predicting moonlighting proteins.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2017Article
- Pipeline to Identify Hydroxyproline-Rich Glycoproteins.Plant physiology · 2017Article
- NaviGO: interactive tool for visualization and functional similarity and coherence analysis with gene ontology.BMC bioinformatics · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationMoonlighting proteins (MPs) show multiple cellular functions within a single polypeptide chain. To understand the overall landscape of their functional diversity, it is important to establish a computational method that can identify MPs on a genome scale. Previously, we have systematically characterized MPs using functional and omics-scale information. In this work, we develop a computational prediction model for automatic identification of MPs using a diverse range of protein association information.
resultsWe incorporated a diverse range of protein association information to extract characteristic features of MPs, which range from gene ontology (GO), protein-protein interactions, gene expression, phylogenetic profiles, genetic interactions and network-based graph properties to protein structural properties, i.e. intrinsically disordered regions in the protein chain. Then, we used machine learning classifiers using the broad feature space for predicting MPs. Because many known MPs lack some proteomic features, we developed an imputation technique to fill such missing features. Results on the control dataset show that MPs can be predicted with over 98% accuracy when GO terms are available. Furthermore, using only the omics-based features the method can still identify MPs with over 75% accuracy. Last, we applied the method on three genomes: Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Caenorhabditis elegans and Homo sapiens, and found that about 2-10% of proteins in the genomes are potential MPs. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Code available at http://kiharalab.org/MPprediction CONTACT: dkihara@purdue.edu SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.