ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2016
Characterizing gene sets using discriminative random walks with restart on heterogeneous biological networks.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Anticancer Monotherapy and Polytherapy Drug Response Prediction Using Deep Learning: Guidelines and Best Practices.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025Article
- Network propagation for GWAS analysis: a practical guide to leveraging molecular networks for disease gene discovery.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Review
- ASpediaFI: Functional Interaction Analysis of Alternative Splicing Events.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Identification of transcriptional regulatory network associated with response of host epithelial cells to SARS-CoV-2.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- VarSAn: associating pathways with a set of genomic variants using network analysis.Nucleic acids research · 2021Article
- Using Multilayer Heterogeneous Networks to Infer Functions of Phosphorylated Sites.Journal of proteome research · 2021Article
- A comprehensive review of integrative pharmacology-based investigation: A paradigm shift in traditional Chinese medicine.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2021Review
- A network-informed analysis of SARS-CoV-2 and hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis genes' interactions points to Neutrophil extracellular traps as mediators of thrombosis in COVID-19.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- Uncovering Effective Explanations for Interactive Genomic Data Analysis.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2020Article
- Article
- Knowledge-guided analysis of "omics" data using the KnowEnG cloud platform.PLoS biology · 2020Article
- Tissue-guided LASSO for prediction of clinical drug response using preclinical samples.PLoS computational biology · 2020Article
- Machine Learning for Integrating Data in Biology and Medicine: Principles, Practice, and Opportunities.An international journal on information fusion · 2019Article
- A subtype of oral, laryngeal, esophageal, and lung, squamous cell carcinoma with high levels of TrkB-T1 neurotrophin receptor mRNA.BMC cancer · 2019Article
- Cross-species systems analysis of evolutionary toolkits of neurogenomic response to social challenge.Genes, brain, and behavior · 2019Article
- Article
- One for all and all for One: Improving replication of genetic studies through network diffusion.PLoS genetics · 2018Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationAnalysis of co-expressed gene sets typically involves testing for enrichment of different annotations or 'properties' such as biological processes, pathways, transcription factor binding sites, etc., one property at a time. This common approach ignores any known relationships among the properties or the genes themselves. It is believed that known biological relationships among genes and their many properties may be exploited to more accurately reveal commonalities of a gene set. Previous work has sought to achieve this by building biological networks that combine multiple types of gene-gene or gene-property relationships, and performing network analysis to identify other genes and properties most relevant to a given gene set. Most existing network-based approaches for recognizing genes or annotations relevant to a given gene set collapse information about different properties to simplify (homogenize) the networks.
resultsWe present a network-based method for ranking genes or properties related to a given gene set. Such related genes or properties are identified from among the nodes of a large, heterogeneous network of biological information. Our method involves a random walk with restarts, performed on an initial network with multiple node and edge types that preserve more of the original, specific property information than current methods that operate on homogeneous networks. In this first stage of our algorithm, we find the properties that are the most relevant to the given gene set and extract a subnetwork of the original network, comprising only these relevant properties. We then re-rank genes by their similarity to the given gene set, based on a second random walk with restarts, performed on the above subnetwork. We demonstrate the effectiveness of this algorithm for ranking genes related to Drosophila embryonic development and aggressive responses in the brains of social animals. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: DRaWR was implemented as an R package available at veda.cs.illinois.edu/DRaWR. CONTACT: blatti@illinois.edu SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.