ArticlePloS one2016
Large Residual Volume, Not Low Packing Density, Is the Most Influential Risk Factor for Recanalization after Coil Embolization of Cerebral Aneurysms.
Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Packing density and the angiographic results of coil embolization of intracranial aneurysms: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2026Pooled it
- Endovascular treatment of basilar apex aneurysms: A bi-institutional case series and exploratory pulsatile computational fluid dynamic analysis.Neurosurgical review · 2026Article
- Endovascular Embolization Through Grafts for Recurrent Giant Complex Internal Carotid Artery Aneurysms After Combined Microsurgical Low-Flow With Subsequent High-Flow Revascularization and Parent Artery Occlusion.Neurosurgery practice · 2024Article
- Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Endovascular Therapy Effectiveness for Unruptured Saccular Intracranial Aneurysms.Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2024Article
- Towards the development of a shape memory polymer for individualized endovascular therapy of intracranial aneurysms using a 3D-printing/leaching method.Advanced engineering materials · 2023Article
- Shape Memory Polymer-Based Endovascular Devices: Design Criteria and Future Perspective.Polymers · 2022Review
- Experimental Study of Coil Compaction: Impact of Pulsatile Stress.Journal of neuroendovascular therapy · 2022Article
- Propensity score-adjusted analysis on stent-assisted coiling versus coiling alone for ruptured intracranial aneurysms.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- An Efficient Method for Aneurysm Volume Quantification Applicable in Any Shape and Modalities.Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society · 2021Article
- Three-dimensional aneurysm volume measurements show no correlation between coil packing density and recurrence.Heliyon · 2020Article
- Aneurysm characteristics, coil packing, and post-coiling hemodynamics affect long-term treatment outcome.Journal of neurointerventional surgery · 2020Article
- Microvascular Revascularization for Recurrent A1 Anterior Cerebral Artery Aneurysm Postendovascular Treatment: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.Asian journal of neurosurgeryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTight coil packing with density of at least 20%-25% is known to be important for preventing recanalization after embolization of cerebral aneurysms. However, large aneurysms sometimes recanalize regardless of the packing density, suggesting that the absolute residual volume which is determined by aneurysm volume and packing density may be more important risk factor for recanalization. To validate this hypothesis, we analyzed the factors affecting the outcomes of treated aneurysms at our institute. METHODS AND
findingsWe included 355 small and large aneurysms. The following six factors were obtained from every case: aneurysm volume (mL), neck size (mm), packing density (%), residual volume (mL), rupture status at presentation, and stent assistance (with or without stent). The data were then subjected to multivariate logistic regression analysis to identify significant risk factors for recanalization. Recanalization occurred in 61 aneurysms (17.2%). Significant predictors for recanalization were aneurysm volume (odds ratio, 15.3; P < 0.001) and residual volume (odds ratio, 30.9; P < 0.001), but not packing density (odds ratio, 0.98; P = 0.341). These results showed that for each 0.1-mL increase in aneurysm volume and residual volume, the risk of recanalization increased by 1.3 times and 1.4 times, respectively.
conclusionsThe most influential risk factor for recanalization after coil embolization was residual volume, not packing density. The larger the aneurysm volume, the greater the packing density has to be to minimize the residual volume and risk of recanalization. Since tight coil packing has already been aimed, further innovation of coil property or embolization technique may be needed. Otherwise, different treatment modality such as flow diverter or parent artery occlusion may have to be considered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.