Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27153085›Full record

Trial reportNutrients2016

Cohort Analysis of a 24-Week Randomized Controlled Trial to Assess the Efficacy of a Novel, Partial Meal Replacement Program Targeting Weight Loss and Risk Factor Reduction in Overweight/Obese Adults.

Emily Brindal, Gilly A Hendrie, Pennie Taylor, Jill Freyne, Manny Noakes

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nutrients, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. The effectiveness of app-based mobile interventions on nutrition behaviours and nutrition-related health outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Emily BrindalFood and Nutrition, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization (CSIRO), PO Box 10041, Adelaide, South Australia 5000, Australia. Emily.Brindal@csiro.au.
Gilly A HendrieFood and Nutrition, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization (CSIRO), PO Box 10041, Adelaide, South Australia 5000, Australia. Gilly.Hendrie@csiro.au.
Pennie TaylorFood and Nutrition, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization (CSIRO), PO Box 10041, Adelaide, South Australia 5000, Australia. Pennie.Taylor@csiro.au.
Jill FreyneHealth and Biosecurity, CSIRO, GPO Box 76, Epping, New South Wales 1710, Australia. Jill.Freyne@csiro.au.
Manny NoakesFood and Nutrition, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization (CSIRO), PO Box 10041, Adelaide, South Australia 5000, Australia. Manny.Noakes@csiro.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our aim was to design and evaluate a weight-loss program, including a partial meal replacement program, point-of-care testing and face-to-face and smartphone app support, appropriate for delivery in a community pharmacy setting. Overweight or obese adults (n = 146, 71.2% female, 48.18 ± 11.75 years old) were recruited to participate in a 24-week weight loss study and randomised to two app conditions. The dietary intervention was consistent regardless of app. Twelve weeks of clinic appointments with a trained consultant were followed by only app support for an additional 12 weeks. By week 24, retention was 57.5%. There were no differences between app conditions. Based on a cohort analysis of the trial, the mean decrease in weight from baseline to week 24 was 6.43 ± 1.06 kg for males (p < 0.001) and 5.66 ± 0.70 kg for females (p < 0.001). Mixed models also revealed decreases for LDL Cholesterol (-0.13 ± 0.08 mmol/L, nonsignificant), triglycerides (-0.08 ± 0.05 mmol/L, nonsignificant) and an increase in HDL cholesterol (+0.08 ± 0.04 mmol/L, ns) were not significant by week 24. Blood glucose (-0.23 ± 0.08 mmol/L, p = 0.040) and blood pressure (Systolic blood pressure -5.77 ± 1.21 Hg/mm, p < 0.001) were significantly lower at week 24 compared to baseline. Weight loss self-efficacy increased and remained significantly higher than baseline at week 24 (16.85 ± 2.93, p < 0.001). Overall, the program supported participants and was successful in achieving significant weight loss and improvements in health outcomes over 24 weeks.

Indexed as

MealsWeight LossAdultCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOverweightRisk FactorsTime Factorsdietmeal replacementpharmacysmartphoneweight loss

Identifiers

PMID27153085
PMCPMC4882678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.