Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27152964›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2016

Determination of Rod and Cone Influence to the Early and Late Dynamic of the Pupillary Light Response.

Corinne Kostic, Sylvain V Crippa, Catherine Martin, Randy H Kardon, Martin Biel, Yvan Arsenijevic, Aki Kawasaki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Pupillary Light Reflex Induced by Two-Photon Vision.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The flicker Pupil Light Response (fPLR).Translational vision science & technology · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Standards in Pupillography.Frontiers in neurology · 2019
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Corinne KosticDepartment of Ophthalmology University Lausanne, Hôpital Ophtalmique Jules Gonin, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Sylvain V CrippaDepartment of Ophthalmology University Lausanne, Hôpital Ophtalmique Jules Gonin, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Catherine MartinDepartment of Ophthalmology University Lausanne, Hôpital Ophtalmique Jules Gonin, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Randy H KardonDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Iowa School of Medicine and Iowa City VA Center for Prevention and Treatment of Visual Loss, Iowa City, Iowa, United States.
Martin BielCenter for Integrated Protein Science Munich CiPS at the Department of Pharmacy - Center for Drug Research, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Yvan ArsenijevicDepartment of Ophthalmology University Lausanne, Hôpital Ophtalmique Jules Gonin, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Aki KawasakiDepartment of Ophthalmology University Lausanne, Hôpital Ophtalmique Jules Gonin, Lausanne, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aims to identify which aspects of the pupil light reflex are most influenced by rods and cones independently by analyzing pupil recordings from different mouse models of photoreceptor deficiency.

methodsOne-month-old wild type (WT), rodless (Rho-/-), coneless (Cnga3-/-), or photoreceptor less (Cnga3-/-; Rho-/- or Gnat1-/-) mice were subjected to brief red and blue light stimuli of increasing intensity. To describe the initial dynamic response to light, the maximal pupillary constriction amplitudes and the derivative curve of the first 3 seconds were determined. To estimate the postillumination phase, the constriction amplitude at 9.5 seconds after light termination was related to the maximal constriction amplitude.

resultsRho-/- mice showed decreased constriction amplitude but more prolonged pupilloconstriction to all blue and red light stimuli compared to wild type mice. Cnga3-/- mice had constriction amplitudes similar to WT however following maximal constriction, the early and rapid dilation to low intensity blue light was decreased. To high intensity blue light, the Cnga3-/- mice demonstrated marked prolongation of the pupillary constriction. Cnga3-/-; Rho-/- mice had no pupil response to red light of low and medium intensity.

conclusionsFrom specific gene defective mouse models which selectively voided the rod or cone function, we determined that mouse rod photoreceptors are highly contributing to the pupil response to blue light stimuli but also to low and medium red stimuli. We also observed that cone cells mainly drive the partial rapid dilation of the initial response to low blue light stimuli. Thus photoreceptor dysfunction can be derived from chromatic pupillometry in mouse models.

Indexed as

LightAnimalsMiceModels, AnimalPhotic StimulationPupilReflex, PupillaryRetinal Cone Photoreceptor CellsRetinal Ganglion CellsRetinal Rod Photoreceptor CellsRod OpsinsRod Opsins

Identifiers

PMID27152964
PMCPMC4868103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.