Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27152857›Full record

ArticleCancer2016

Change in chemotherapy during concurrent radiation followed by surgery after a suboptimal positron emission tomography response to induction chemotherapy improves outcomes for locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Geoffrey Y Ku, Anuja Kriplani, Yelena Y Janjigian, David P Kelsen, Valerie W Rusch, Manjit Bains, Joanne Chou, Marinela Capanu, Abraham J Wu, Karyn A Goodman and 1 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01333033 phase2completednot on this map

Randomized Phase II Trial of PET Scan-Directed Combined Modality Therapy in Esophageal Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorAlliance for Clinical Trials in OncologyRan2011 to 2023Enrolled257ConditionsAdenocarcinoma of the Gastroesophageal Junction, Esophageal CancerArmsOxaliplatin, Leucovorin Calcium, Fluorouracil, Carboplatin, Paclitaxel
NCT03791905 phase2unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

A Phase II Randomized Trial of PET Imaging in Assessing Response to Induction Chemotherapy in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Treated With Definitive Chemoradiotherapy

TypeinterventionalSponsorMian XIRan2019 to 2023Enrolled216ConditionsNeoplasm, Esophageal, Squamous Cell CarcinomaArmsPaclitaxel, Cisplatin, Oxaliplatin, 5-FU, Leucovorin
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Prognostic and predictive values of interimAnnals of nuclear medicine · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Clinical Utility ofDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. The Role of the TP53 Pathway in Predicting Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy in Esophageal Adenocarcinoma.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2017
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Geoffrey Y KuGastrointestinal Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Anuja KriplaniDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Yelena Y JanjigianGastrointestinal Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
David P KelsenGastrointestinal Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Valerie W RuschThoracic Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Manjit BainsThoracic Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Joanne ChouEpidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Marinela CapanuEpidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Abraham J WuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Karyn A GoodmanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Denver, Colorado.
David H IlsonGastrointestinal Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA positron emission tomography (PET) scan after induction chemotherapy before preoperative chemoradiation and surgery for esophageal adenocarcinoma predicts outcomes. Some patients with progression on PET after induction chemotherapy had long-term overall survival (OS) when they were changed to alternative chemotherapy during radiation.

methodsThis study retrospectively reviewed esophageal adenocarcinoma patients who received induction chemotherapy and chemoradiation before planned surgery; all had undergone a PET scan before and after induction chemotherapy.

resultsThere were 201 patients, and 113 (56%) were PET responders (≥35% decrease in the maximum standardized uptake value of the tumor). All PET responders received the same chemotherapy during radiation, whereas 38 of the 88 PET nonresponders (43%) changed chemotherapy. Among the 152 patients who underwent surgery, the pathologic complete response rate was 15% for PET responders and 3% for PET nonresponders who did not change chemotherapy (P = .046). The median progression-free survival (PFS; 18.9 vs 10.0 months, P < 0.01) and OS (37 vs 25.3 months, P = .02) were significantly better for PET responders versus PET nonresponders who did not change chemotherapy. The median PFS for PET nonresponders who changed chemotherapy was 17.9 months, and it was superior to the median PFS for PET nonresponders who did not change chemotherapy (P = .01). For PET nonresponders, the 5-year OS rates were 37% for those who changed chemotherapy and 25% for those who did not change chemotherapy (P = .18).

conclusionsA PET scan after induction chemotherapy predicts outcomes for locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma patients who undergo chemoradiation and surgery. The median PFS is improved, and trends toward improved OS appear possible in PET nonresponders who change chemotherapy during radiation. The fully accrued Cancer and Leukemia Group B 80803 study (NCT01333033) is evaluating this strategy. Cancer 2016;122:2083-90. © 2016 American Cancer Society.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overEsophageal NeoplasmsFemaleHumansInduction ChemotherapyMaleMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyPositron-Emission TomographyRadiotherapyRetrospective StudiesSurvival AnalysisTreatment Outcomechemoradiationchemotherapyesophageal adenocarcinomainductionpositron emission tomography (PET) scan

Identifiers

PMID27152857
PMCPMC4911302
OpenAlexW2345394353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.