Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27152612›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Predictors of Uptake and Timeliness of Newly Introduced Pneumococcal and Rotavirus Vaccines, and of Measles Vaccine in Rural Malawi: A Population Cohort Study.

Hazzie Mvula, Ellen Heinsbroek, Menard Chihana, Amelia C Crampin, Storn Kabuluzi, Geoffrey Chirwa, Charles Mwansambo, Anthony Costello, Nigel A Cunliffe, Robert S Heyderman and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Hazzie MvulaKaronga Prevention Study, Chilumba, Malawi.
Ellen HeinsbroekInstitute of Infection & Global Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Menard ChihanaKaronga Prevention Study, Chilumba, Malawi.
Amelia C CrampinKaronga Prevention Study, Chilumba, Malawi.
Storn KabuluziExpanded Programme for Immunisation Office and Preventive Services Office, Ministry of Health, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Geoffrey ChirwaExpanded Programme for Immunisation Office and Preventive Services Office, Ministry of Health, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Charles MwansamboChief of Health Services, Ministry of Health, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Anthony CostelloInstitute of Global Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Nigel A CunliffeInstitute of Infection & Global Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Robert S HeydermanLiverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Neil FrenchInstitute of Infection & Global Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Naor Bar-ZeevInstitute of Infection & Global Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
VacSurv Consortium

Funding

Wellcome Trust 098610Wellcome Trust WT091909/B/10/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMalawi introduced pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) and monovalent rotavirus vaccine (RV1) in 2011 and 2012 respectively, and is planning the introduction of a second-dose measles vaccine (MV). We assessed predictors of availability, uptake and timeliness of these vaccines in a rural Malawian setting.

methodsCommencing on the first date of PCV13 eligibility we conducted a prospective population-based birth cohort study of 2,616 children under demographic surveillance in Karonga District, northern Malawi who were eligible for PCV13, or from the date of RV1 introduction both PCV13 and RV1. Potential predictors of vaccine uptake and timeliness for PCV13, RV1 and MV were analysed respectively using robust Poisson and Cox regression.

resultsVaccine coverage was high for all vaccines, ranging from 86.9% for RV1 dose 2 to 95.4% for PCV13 dose 1. Median time delay for PCV13 dose 1 was 17 days (IQR 7-36), 19 days (IQR 8-36) for RV1 dose 1 and 20 days (IQR 3-46) for MV. Infants born to lower educated or farming mothers and those living further away from the road or clinic were at greater risk of being not fully vaccinated and being vaccinated late. Delays in vaccination were also associated with non-facility birth. Vaccine stock-outs resulted in both a delay in vaccine timeliness and in a decrease in completion of schedule.

conclusionDespite high vaccination coverage in this setting, delays in vaccination were common. We identified programmatic and socio-demographic risk factors for uptake and timeliness of vaccination. Understanding who remains most vulnerable to be unvaccinated allows for focussed delivery thereby increasing population coverage and maximising the equitable benefits of universal vaccination programmes.

Indexed as

Rural PopulationChildCohort StudiesHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMalawiMeasles VaccinePneumococcal VaccinesRotavirus VaccinesMeasles VaccinePneumococcal VaccinesRotavirus Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID27152612
PMCPMC4859501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.