Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27152358›Full record

ArticleScience advances2016

A checkpoint control orchestrates the replication of the two chromosomes of Vibrio cholerae.

Marie-Eve Val, Martial Marbouty, Francisco de Lemos Martins, Sean P Kennedy, Harry Kemble, Michael J Bland, Christophe Possoz, Romain Koszul, Ole Skovgaard, Didier Mazel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 98 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
98citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

98 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Defence systems encoded by core genomic islands of seventh pandemicPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. A comparative genomic and phenotypic study ofMicrobiology (Reading, England) · 2024
    Article
  17. Bacterial growth dynamics in a rhythmic symbiosis.Molecular biology of the cell · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

38 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Marie-Eve ValBacterial Genome Plasticity, Department of Genomes and Genetics, Institut Pasteur, Paris 75015, France.; CNRS UMR 3525, Paris 75015, France.
Martial MarboutyCNRS UMR 3525, Paris 75015, France.; Spatial Regulation of Genomes, Department of Genomes and Genetics, Institut Pasteur, Paris 75015, France.
Francisco de Lemos MartinsBacterial Genome Plasticity, Department of Genomes and Genetics, Institut Pasteur, Paris 75015, France.; CNRS UMR 3525, Paris 75015, France.
Sean P KennedyBiomics Pole, CITECH, Institut Pasteur, Paris 75015, France.
Harry KembleBacterial Genome Plasticity, Department of Genomes and Genetics, Institut Pasteur, Paris 75015, France.; CNRS UMR 3525, Paris 75015, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1480-5873
Michael J BlandBacterial Genome Plasticity, Department of Genomes and Genetics, Institut Pasteur, Paris 75015, France.; CNRS UMR 3525, Paris 75015, France.
Christophe PossozDepartment of Genome Biology, Institute of Integrative Biology of the Cell (I2BC), Paris-Sud University, CEA, CNRS, Gif-sur-Yvette 91190, France.
Romain KoszulCNRS UMR 3525, Paris 75015, France.; Spatial Regulation of Genomes, Department of Genomes and Genetics, Institut Pasteur, Paris 75015, France.
Ole SkovgaardDepartment of Science, Systems and Models, Roskilde University, Roskilde DK-4000, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-4860-1847
Didier MazelBacterial Genome Plasticity, Department of Genomes and Genetics, Institut Pasteur, Paris 75015, France.; CNRS UMR 3525, Paris 75015, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacteria with multiple chromosomes represent up to 10% of all bacterial species. Unlike eukaryotes, these bacteria use chromosome-specific initiators for their replication. In all cases investigated, the machineries for secondary chromosome replication initiation are of plasmid origin. One of the important differences between plasmids and chromosomes is that the latter replicate during a defined period of the cell cycle, ensuring a single round of replication per cell. Vibrio cholerae carries two circular chromosomes, Chr1 and Chr2, which are replicated in a well-orchestrated manner with the cell cycle and coordinated in such a way that replication termination occurs at the same time. However, the mechanism coordinating this synchrony remains speculative. We investigated this mechanism and revealed that initiation of Chr2 replication is triggered by the replication of a 150-bp locus positioned on Chr1, called crtS. This crtS replication-mediated Chr2 replication initiation mechanism explains how the two chromosomes communicate to coordinate their replication. Our study reveals a new checkpoint control mechanism in bacteria, and highlights possible functional interactions mediated by contacts between two chromosomes, an unprecedented observation in bacteria.

Indexed as

Bacterial ProteinsCell Cycle CheckpointsChromosomes, BacterialChromosome SegregationDNA ReplicationGene Expression Regulation, BacterialGenome, BacterialPlasmidsReplication OriginVibrio choleraeBacterial Proteinscell cyclecholerachromosomemultipartite genomepathogensplasmidsreplicationreplication initiationsecondary chromosomeVibrio

Identifiers

PMID27152358
PMCPMC4846446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.