Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27152244›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of cancer research2016

L-MTP-PE and zoledronic acid combination in osteosarcoma: preclinical evidence of positive therapeutic combination for clinical transfer.

Kevin Biteau, Romain Guiho, Mathias Chatelais, Julien Taurelle, Julie Chesneau, Nadège Corradini, Dominique Heymann, Françoise Redini

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of cancer research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Recent and Ongoing Research into Metastatic Osteosarcoma Treatments.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  9. Novel molecules as the emerging trends in cancer treatment: an update.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2022
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Osteosarcoma Overview.Rheumatology and therapy · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kevin BiteauINSERM, UMR-957, Equipe Ligue Contre le Cancer 2012Nantes, F-44035, France; Université de Nantes, Faculté de Médecine, Laboratoire De Physiopathologie De La Résorption Osseuse Et Thérapie Des Tumeurs Osseuses PrimitivesNantes, F-44035, France.
Romain GuihoINSERM, UMR-957, Equipe Ligue Contre le Cancer 2012Nantes, F-44035, France; Université de Nantes, Faculté de Médecine, Laboratoire De Physiopathologie De La Résorption Osseuse Et Thérapie Des Tumeurs Osseuses PrimitivesNantes, F-44035, France.
Mathias ChatelaisINSERM, UMR-957, Equipe Ligue Contre le Cancer 2012Nantes, F-44035, France; Université de Nantes, Faculté de Médecine, Laboratoire De Physiopathologie De La Résorption Osseuse Et Thérapie Des Tumeurs Osseuses PrimitivesNantes, F-44035, France.
Julien TaurelleINSERM, UMR-957, Equipe Ligue Contre le Cancer 2012Nantes, F-44035, France; Université de Nantes, Faculté de Médecine, Laboratoire De Physiopathologie De La Résorption Osseuse Et Thérapie Des Tumeurs Osseuses PrimitivesNantes, F-44035, France.
Julie ChesneauINSERM, UMR-957, Equipe Ligue Contre le Cancer 2012Nantes, F-44035, France; Université de Nantes, Faculté de Médecine, Laboratoire De Physiopathologie De La Résorption Osseuse Et Thérapie Des Tumeurs Osseuses PrimitivesNantes, F-44035, France.
Nadège CorradiniINSERM, UMR-957, Equipe Ligue Contre le Cancer 2012Nantes, F-44035, France; Université de Nantes, Faculté de Médecine, Laboratoire De Physiopathologie De La Résorption Osseuse Et Thérapie Des Tumeurs Osseuses PrimitivesNantes, F-44035, France; Pediatric Oncology Unit, Hôpital Mère-EnfantNantes, F-44035, France.
Dominique HeymannINSERM, UMR-957, Equipe Ligue Contre le Cancer 2012Nantes, F-44035, France; Université de Nantes, Faculté de Médecine, Laboratoire De Physiopathologie De La Résorption Osseuse Et Thérapie Des Tumeurs Osseuses PrimitivesNantes, F-44035, France.
Françoise RediniINSERM, UMR-957, Equipe Ligue Contre le Cancer 2012Nantes, F-44035, France; Université de Nantes, Faculté de Médecine, Laboratoire De Physiopathologie De La Résorption Osseuse Et Thérapie Des Tumeurs Osseuses PrimitivesNantes, F-44035, France; CHU Hôtel DieuNantes, F-44035, France.
Inserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Osteosarcoma, the most frequent malignant primary bone tumor in pediatric patients is characterized by osteolysis promoting tumor growth. Lung metastasis is the major bad prognosis factor of this disease. Zoledronic Acid (ZA), a potent inhibitor of bone resorption is currently evaluated in phase III randomized studies in Europe for the treatment of osteosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma. The beneficial effect of the liposomal form of Muramyl-TriPeptide-Phosphatidyl Ethanolamine (L-mifamurtide, MEPACT®), an activator of macrophage populations has been demonstrated to eradicate lung metastatic foci in osteosarcoma. The objective of this study was to evaluate the potential therapeutic benefit and the safety of the ZA and L-mifamurtide combination in preclinical models of osteosarcoma, as a prerequisite before translation to patients. The effects of ZA (100 μg/kg) and L-mifamurtide (1 mg/kg) were investigated in vivo in xenogeneic and syngeneic mice models of osteosarcoma, at clinical (tumor proliferation, spontaneous lung metastases development), radiological (bone microarchitecture by microCT analysis), biological and histological levels. No interference between the two drugs could be observed on ZA-induced bone protection and on L-mifamurtide-induced inhibition of lung metastasis development. Unexpectedly, ZA and L-mifamurtide association induced an additional and in some cases synergistic inhibition of primary tumor progression. L-mifamurtide has no effect on tumor proliferation in vitro or in vivo, and macrophage population was not affected at the tumor site whatever the treatment. This study evidenced for the first time a significant inhibition of primary osteosarcoma progression when both drugs are combined. This result constitutes a first proof-of-principle for clinical application in osteosarcoma patients.

Indexed as

bone protectioninhibition of lung metastases developmentliposomal mifamurtideOsteosarcomazoledronic acid

Identifiers

PMID27152244
PMCPMC4851846
OpenAlexW2345534701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.