Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27152226›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2016

Rat eradication comes within a whisker! A case study of a failed project from the South Pacific.

W Amos, H J Nichols, T Churchyard, M de L Brooke

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Evolutionary applications · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. The kin-selected context of dueling in horned aphids: cooperation or conflict?Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

W AmosDepartment of Zoology , University of Cambridge , Downing Street, Cambridge , UK.
H J NicholsDepartment of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, UK; School of Natural Science and Psychology, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4455-6065
T ChurchyardRSPB Centre for Conservation Science, Royal Society for the Protection of Birds , Sandy , UK.
M de L BrookeDepartment of Zoology , University of Cambridge , Downing Street, Cambridge , UK.
University of Cambridge · GBRoyal Society for the Protection of Birds · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To enhance their conservation value, several hundred islands worldwide have been cleared of invasive alien rats, Rattus spp. One of the largest projects yet undertaken was on 43 km(2) Henderson Island in the Pitcairn group, South Pacific, in August 2011. Following massive immediate mortality, a single R. exulans was observed in March 2012 and, subsequently, rat numbers have recovered. The survivors show no sign of resistance to the toxicant used, brodifacoum. Using pre- and post-operation rat tissue samples from Henderson, plus samples from around the Pacific, we exclude re-introduction as the source of continued rat presence. Microsatellite analysis of 18 loci enabled comparison of genetic diversity of Henderson rats before and after the bait drop. The fall in diversity measured by allele frequency change indicated that the bottleneck (N e) through which the breeding population passed was probably around 50 individuals, representing a census population of about 60-80 animals. This is the first failed project that has estimated how close it was to success.

Indexed as

brodifacoumgenetic diversityHenderson IslandheterozygosityPitcairn IslandsRattus exulans

Identifiers

PMID27152226
PMCPMC4852649
OpenAlexW2339251407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.