Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27152222›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2016

Mix it and fix it: functions of composite olfactory signals in ring-tailed lemurs.

Lydia K Greene, Kathleen E Grogan, Kendra N Smyth, Christine A Adams, Skylar A Klager, Christine M Drea

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
11.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Behavioural Correlates of Lemur Scent-Marking in Wild Diademed Sifakas (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  4. The Scent Enriched Primate.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Sexual Dimorphism in Crowned Lemur Scent-Marking.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lydia K GreeneDepartment of Evolutionary Anthropology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; University Program in Ecology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Kathleen E GroganDepartment of Evolutionary Anthropology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; University Program in Ecology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Kendra N SmythDepartment of Evolutionary Anthropology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; University Program in Ecology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Christine A AdamsDepartment of Evolutionary Anthropology , Duke University , Durham, NC , USA.
Skylar A KlagerDepartment of Evolutionary Anthropology , Duke University , Durham, NC , USA.
Christine M DreaDepartment of Evolutionary Anthropology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; University Program in Ecology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Duke University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animals communicating via scent often deposit composite signals that incorporate odorants from multiple sources; however, the function of mixing chemical signals remains understudied. We tested both a 'multiple-messages' and a 'fixative' hypothesis of composite olfactory signalling, which, respectively, posit that mixing scents functions to increase information content or prolong signal longevity. Our subjects-adult, male ring-tailed lemurs (Lemur catta)-have a complex scent-marking repertoire, involving volatile antebrachial (A) secretions, deposited pure or after being mixed with a squalene-rich paste exuded from brachial (B) glands. Using behavioural bioassays, we examined recipient responses to odorants collected from conspecific strangers. We concurrently presented pure A, pure B and mixed A + B secretions, in fresh or decayed conditions. Lemurs preferentially responded to mixed over pure secretions, their interest increasing and shifting over time, from sniffing and countermarking fresh mixtures, to licking and countermarking decayed mixtures. Substituting synthetic squalene (S)-a well-known fixative-for B secretions did not replicate prior results: B secretions, which contain additional chemicals that probably encode salient information, were preferred over pure S. Whereas support for the 'multiple-messages' hypothesis underscores the unique contribution from each of an animal's various secretions, support for the 'fixative' hypothesis highlights the synergistic benefits of composite signals.

Indexed as

behavioural bioassaycomposite signalintrasexual competitionolfactory communicationscent markstrepsirrhine primate

Identifiers

PMID27152222
PMCPMC4852645
OpenAlexW2338080376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.