Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27152139›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery2016

Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy for complete rectal prolapse: A retrospective study evaluating outcomes in North Indian population.

Abhijit Chandra, Saket Kumar, Ajeet Pratap Maurya, Vishal Gupta, Vivek Gupta, Rahul

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastrointestinal surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Per anal endoscopic rectopexy for treatment of complete rectal prolapse: A preliminary report.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2019
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Abhijit ChandraAbhijit Chandra, Saket Kumar, Ajeet Pratap Maurya, Vishal Gupta, Vivek Gupta, Rahul, Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, King George's Medical University, Lucknow 226003, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Saket KumarAbhijit Chandra, Saket Kumar, Ajeet Pratap Maurya, Vishal Gupta, Vivek Gupta, Rahul, Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, King George's Medical University, Lucknow 226003, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Ajeet Pratap MauryaAbhijit Chandra, Saket Kumar, Ajeet Pratap Maurya, Vishal Gupta, Vivek Gupta, Rahul, Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, King George's Medical University, Lucknow 226003, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Vishal GuptaAbhijit Chandra, Saket Kumar, Ajeet Pratap Maurya, Vishal Gupta, Vivek Gupta, Rahul, Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, King George's Medical University, Lucknow 226003, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Vivek GuptaAbhijit Chandra, Saket Kumar, Ajeet Pratap Maurya, Vishal Gupta, Vivek Gupta, Rahul, Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, King George's Medical University, Lucknow 226003, Uttar Pradesh, India.
RahulAbhijit Chandra, Saket Kumar, Ajeet Pratap Maurya, Vishal Gupta, Vivek Gupta, Rahul, Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, King George's Medical University, Lucknow 226003, Uttar Pradesh, India.
King George's Medical University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo analyze the outcomes of laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy in the management of complete rectal prolapse (CRP) in North Indian patients with inherent bulky and redundant colon.

methodsThe study was conducted at a tertiary health care center of North India. Between January 2010 and October 2014, 15 patients who underwent laparoscopic ventral mesh repair for CRP, were evaluated in the present study. Perioperative outcomes, improvement in bowel dysfunction or appearance of new complications were documented from the hospital records maintained prospectively.

resultsFifteen patients (9 female) with a median age of 50 years (range, 15-68) were included in the study. The median operative time was 200 min (range, 180-350 min) and the median post-operative stay was 4 d (range, 3-21 d). No operative mortality occurred. One patient with inadvertent small bowel injury required laparotomy on post-operative day 2. At a median follow-up of 22 mo (range, 4-54 mo), no prolapse recurrence was reported. No mesh-related complication was encountered. Wexner constipation score improved significantly from the preoperative value of 17 (range, 5-24) to 6 (range, 0-23) (P < 0.001) and the fecal incontinence severity index score from 24 (range, 0-53) to 2 (range, 0-53) (P = 0.007). No de novo constipation or fecal incontinence was recorded during the follow-up. On personal conversation, all patients expressed satisfaction with the outcome of their treatment.

conclusionOur experience indicates that laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy is an effective surgical option for CRP in North Indian patients having a bulky redundant colon.

Indexed as

Complete rectal prolapseConstipationIndian populationRedundant sigmoidVentral rectopexy

Identifiers

PMID27152139
PMCPMC4840172
OpenAlexW2340574971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.