Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27151979›Full record

ArticleGenes & development2016

Molecular basis of PRC1 targeting to Polycomb response elements by PhoRC.

Felice Frey, Thomas Sheahan, Katja Finkl, Gabriele Stoehr, Matthias Mann, Christian Benda, Jürg Müller

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes & development, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 118 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Sticky, Adaptable, and Many-sided: SAM protein versatility in normal and pathological hematopoietic states.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2023
    Review
  17. Polycomb Recruiters Inside and Outside of the Repressed Domains.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Genetic and Epigenetic Regulation ofJournal of developmental biology · 2023
    Review
  20. Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Felice FreyLaboratory of Chromatin Biology, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, 82152 Martinsried, Germany;
Thomas SheahanLaboratory of Chromatin Biology, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, 82152 Martinsried, Germany;
Katja FinklLaboratory of Chromatin Biology, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, 82152 Martinsried, Germany;
Gabriele StoehrDepartment of Proteomics and Signal Transduction, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, 82152 Martinsried, Germany;
Matthias MannDepartment of Proteomics and Signal Transduction, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, 82152 Martinsried, Germany;
Christian BendaDepartment of Structural Cell Biology, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, 82152 Martinsried, Germany.
Jürg MüllerLaboratory of Chromatin Biology, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, 82152 Martinsried, Germany;
Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polycomb group (PcG) protein complexes repress transcription by modifying target gene chromatin. In Drosophila, this repression requires association of PcG protein complexes with cis-regulatory Polycomb response elements (PREs), but the interactions permitting formation of these assemblies are poorly understood. We show that the Sfmbt subunit of the DNA-binding Pho-repressive complex (PhoRC) and the Scm subunit of the canonical Polycomb-repressive complex 1 (PRC1) directly bind each other through their SAM domains. The 1.9 Å crystal structure of the Scm-SAM:Sfmbt-SAM complex reveals the recognition mechanism and shows that Sfmbt-SAM lacks the polymerization capacity of the SAM domains of Scm and its PRC1 partner subunit, Ph. Functional analyses in Drosophila demonstrate that Sfmbt-SAM and Scm-SAM are essential for repression and that PhoRC DNA binding is critical to initiate PRC1 association with PREs. Together, this suggests that PRE-tethered Sfmbt-SAM nucleates PRC1 recruitment and that Scm-SAM/Ph-SAM-mediated polymerization then results in the formation of PRC1-compacted chromatin.

Indexed as

Models, MolecularAnimalsChromatinCrystallographyDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsGene Expression RegulationPolycomb-Group ProteinsPolycomb Repressive Complex 1PolymerizationProtein BindingProtein Structure, TertiaryResponse ElementsChromatinDrosophila ProteinsPolycomb-Group ProteinsPolycomb Repressive Complex 1SCM protein, DrosophilaSfmbt protein, DrosophilaDrosophilaPhoRCPolycomb response elementPRC1SAM domain

Identifiers

PMID27151979
PMCPMC4863741
OpenAlexW2346071487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.