Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27151655›Full record

ArticleThe oncologist2016

The PROFILE Feasibility Study: Targeted Screening of Men With a Family History of Prostate Cancer.

Elena Castro, Christos Mikropoulos, Elizabeth K Bancroft, Tokhir Dadaev, Chee Goh, Natalie Taylor, Edward Saunders, Nigel Borley, Diana Keating, Elizabeth C Page and 11 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The oncologist, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05681416 (Prostate Cancer Prevention Clinic for Men With Risk of Familial Prostate Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05681416 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Prostate Cancer Prevention Clinic for Men With Risk of Familial Prostate Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorHeinrich-Heine University, DuesseldorfRan2023 to 2027Enrolled300ConditionsProstate Cancer, Familial Prostate CancerArmsPanel sequencing, whole exome sequencing, whole genome sequencing
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Polygenic risk scores in cancer.Medizinische Genetik : Mitteilungsblatt des Berufsverbandes Medizinische Genetik e.V · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Prostate cancer screening-when to start and how to screen?Translational andrology and urology · 2018
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. PRECISION MANAGEMENT OF LOCALIZED PROSTATE CANCER.Expert review of precision medicine and drug development · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Elena CastroOncogenetics Team, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom Academic Urology Unit, The Royal Marsden National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Christos MikropoulosOncogenetics Team, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom Academic Urology Unit, The Royal Marsden National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Elizabeth K BancroftOncogenetics Team, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom Academic Urology Unit, The Royal Marsden National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Tokhir DadaevOncogenetics Team, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.
Chee GohOncogenetics Team, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom Academic Urology Unit, The Royal Marsden National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Natalie TaylorOncogenetics Team, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom Academic Urology Unit, The Royal Marsden National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Edward SaundersOncogenetics Team, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.
Nigel BorleyAcademic Urology Unit, The Royal Marsden National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Diana KeatingOncogenetics Team, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.
Elizabeth C PageOncogenetics Team, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.
Sibel SayaOncogenetics Team, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.
Stephen HazellHistopathology Department, The Royal Marsden National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Naomi LivniHistopathology Department, The Royal Marsden National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Nandita deSouzaDivision of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, United Kingdom.
David NealDepartment of Oncology, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom Department of Surgery, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Freddie C HamdyNuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Pardeep KumarAcademic Urology Unit, The Royal Marsden National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Antonis C AntoniouCentre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Zsofia Kote-JaraiOncogenetics Team, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.
PROFILE Study Steering Committee
Rosalind A EelesOncogenetics Team, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom Academic Urology Unit, The Royal Marsden National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom ros.eeles@icr.ac.uk.
National Health Service · GBInstitute of Cancer Research · GBCancer Research UK Cambridge Center · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Epidemiologic StudiesU19CA148065 · NCI · HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI AHSAN, HABIBUL, BRUGGE, JOAN SIEFERT · 2010 to 2014
$10.6M
Epidemiological and Clinical Translational Studies Post Genome-Wide AssociationU19CA148537 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI EASTON, DOUGLAS FREDERICK, EELES, ROSALIND · 2010 to 2014
$10.4M
Ovarian cancer GWAS discovery, expansion and replication (N2 - Project #1)U19CA148112 · NCI · H. LEE MOFFITT CANCER CTR & RES INST · PI SELLERS, THOMAS A · 2010 to 2014
$10.2M
A genome-wide association study for breast cancer in BRCA1 mutation carriersR01CA128978 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI COUCH, FERGUS JOSEPH · 2008 to 2012
$4.8M
Cancer Research UK 11174Cancer Research UK 13232Cancer Research UK 15007Cancer Research UK C1281/A12014Cancer Research UK C1287/A10118Cancer Research UK C1287/A10710Cancer Research UK C5047/A10692Cancer Research UK C5047/A15007Cancer Research UK C5047/A8384Cancer Research UK C8197/A16565Medical Research Council G0701533NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS R01 CA128978NCI NIH HHS U19 CA148065NCI NIH HHS U19 CA148112NCI NIH HHS U19 CA148537
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA better assessment of individualized prostate cancer (PrCa) risk is needed to improve screening. The use of the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level for screening in the general population has limitations and is not currently advocated. Approximately 100 common single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have been identified that are associated with the risk of developing PrCa. The PROFILE pilot study explored the feasibility of using SNP profiling in men with a family history (FH) of PrCa to investigate the probability of detecting PrCa at prostate biopsy (PB). The primary aim of this pilot study was to determine the safety and feasibility of PrCa screening using transrectal ultrasound-guided PB with or without diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) in men with a FH. A secondary aim was to evaluate the potential use of SNP profiling as a screening tool in this population. PATIENTS AND

methodsA total of 100 men aged 40-69 years with a FH of PrCa underwent PB, regardless of their baseline PSA level. Polygenic risk scores (PRSs) were calculated for each participant using 71 common PrCa susceptibility alleles. We treated the disease outcome at PB as the outcome variable and evaluated its associations with the PRS, PSA level, and DW-MRI findings using univariate logistic regression.

resultsOf the 100 men, 25 were diagnosed with PrCa, of whom 12 (48%) had clinically significant disease. Four adverse events occurred and no deaths. The PSA level and age at study entry were associated with PrCa at PB (p = .00037 and p = .00004, respectively).

conclusionThe results of the present pilot study have demonstrated that PB is a feasible and safe method of PrCa screening in men with a FH, with a high proportion of PrCa identified requiring radical treatment. It is feasible to collect data on PrCa-risk SNPs to evaluate their combined effect as a potential screening tool. A larger prospective study powered to detect statistical associations is in progress. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Prostate biopsy is a feasible and safe approach to prostate cancer screening in men with a family history and detects a high proportion of prostate cancer that needs radical treatment. Calculating a polygenic risk score using prostate cancer risk single nucleotide polymorphisms could be a potential future screening tool for prostate cancer.

Indexed as

BiopsyEarly Detection of CancerPolymorphism, Single NucleotideAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingFeasibility StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsProstateProstate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsProstate-Specific AntigenFamily historyProstate cancerProstate-specific antigenSingle nucleotide polymorphisms

Identifiers

PMID27151655
PMCPMC4912360
OpenAlexW2345972868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.