ReviewNeuron2016
RRIDs: A Simple Step toward Improving Reproducibility through Rigor and Transparency of Experimental Methods.
Review in Neuron, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
50 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Building a synthesis-ready research ecosystem: fostering collaboration and open science to accelerate biomedical translation.BMC medical research methodology · 2025Pooled it
- Mouse phenome database: curated data repository with interactive multi-population and multi-trait analyses.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2023Pooled it
- Cross disorder comparisons of brain structure in schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, and 22q11.2 deletion syndrome: A review of ENIGMA findings.Psychiatry and clinical neurosciences · 2022Pooled it
- Actionable solutions to address antibody validation failures.PLoS biology · 2026Article
- From pancreas and islet resources to diabetes insights.Diabetologia · 2026Review
- AI-readiness Criteria for Biomedical Data.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Loss of oligodendrocyte transcription factor 2 protein expression in metabolically stressed oligodendrocytes.Acta neuropathologica · 2026Article
- PRECISE TBI Model Catalog: Increasing Accessibility and Reproducibility in TBI research.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Genetic Insights into the Economic Toll of Cell Line Misidentification: A Comprehensive Review.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Open-source antibodies as a path to enhanced research reproducibility and transparency.New biotechnology · 2025Article
- A consensus platform for antibody characterization.Nature protocols · 2025Article
- Automatic detection and extraction of key resources from tables in biomedical papers.BioData mining · 2025Article
- Data reporting quality and semantic interoperability increase with community-based data elements (CoDEs). Analysis of the open data commons for spinal cord injury (ODC-SCI).Experimental neurology · 2025Article
- The mouse metabolic phenotyping center (MMPC) live consortium: an NIH resource for in vivo characterization of mouse models of diabetes and obesity.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2024Review
- The mutant mouse resource and research center (MMRRC) consortium: the US-based public mouse repository system.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2024Review
- Automatic Detection and Extraction of Key Resources from Tables in Biomedical Papers.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- A Systematic Online Living Evidence Summary of experimental Alzheimer's disease research.Journal of neuroscience methods · 2024Article
- Promoting reusable and open methods and protocols (PRO-MaP) can improve methodological reporting in the life sciences.PLoS biology · 2024Article
- Validation of an organ mapping antibody panel for cyclical immunofluorescence microscopy on normal human kidneys.American journal of physiology. Renal physiology · 2024Article
- 3D bioprinting of liver models: A systematic scoping review of methods, bioinks, and reporting quality.Materials today. Bio · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
With the call for more rigorous scientific reporting, authentication, and transparency from the scientific community and funding agencies, one critical step is to make finding and identifying key resources in the published literature tractable. We discuss here the use of Research Resource Identifiers (RRIDs) as one tool to help resolve this tricky problem in reproducibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.